Preferencias sociales y valoración económica en la gestión sostenible de espacios naturales protegidosel río Segura y su entorno en Cieza (Región de Murcia)

  1. Albaladejo-García, José Antonio 1
  2. Zabala, José Ángel
  3. Navarro, Nuria 2
  4. Alcon, Francisco
  5. Martínez-Paz, José Miguel
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España


  2. 2 Centro Integrado de Formación y Experiencias Agrarias. Molina de Segura
Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada

ISSN: 0210-5462 2340-0129

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 60

Issue: 3

Pages: 212-232

Type: Article

DOI: 10.30827/CUADGEO.V60I3.17754 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada


Natural Protected Areas (NPAs) are areas to be conserved because of their capacity to generate goods and services that benefit the whole population. The anthropic pressure produced by the increase in socio-recreational activities in these areas creates the need to implement measures for their management and conservation. The objective of this work is to economically evaluate the social preferences of the management measures in a NPAs of the Segura river and its surroundings as it passes through Cieza (Region of Murcia, Spain), which has been suffering from a high and growing anthropic pressure. A representative survey of the population of the region where this space is located shows the high acceptance of the new management measures proposed for it. Within these measures, grouped according to the three main sustainability areas (social, economic and environmental), the population shows a greater preference for those of an economic and environmental nature applied in the mountainous area of the NPA. 

Funding information

Este trabajo fue apoyado por el proyecto AgriCambio (PID2020-114576RB-I00 financiado por MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033) y por la Fundaci?n S?neca-Regi?n de Murcia (proyecto 20912/PI/18). Jos? A. Al-baladejo-Garc?a y Jos? A. Zabala agradecen el apoyo financiero del Ministerio de Educaci?n y Formaci?n Personal (FPU 16/03562 y FPU 16/03473).


    • FPU 16/03562 y FPU 16/03473

Bibliographic References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M.(1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice-Hall.
  • Alcon, F., Albaladejo-García, J. A., Zabala, J. A., Marín-Miñano, C., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2019). Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain. Journal for Nature Conservation, 51, 125722.
  • Barba-Romero, S., & Pomerol, J. C. (1997). Decisiones multicriterio: Fundamentos teóricos y utilización práctica. Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • Bergstrom, J. C., & Loomis, J. B. (2017). Economic valuation of river restoration: An analysis of the valuation literature and its uses in decision-making. WaterResources and Economics, 17, 9-19.
  • Bonet-García, F.J., Pérez-Luque, A.J., Moreno-Llorca, R.A., Pérez-Pérez, R., Puerta-Piñero, C., & Zamora, R., (2015). Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: A new synthetic (socioeconomic) approach. Biological Conservation. 187, 221-229.
  • Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder international tool series. Monitoring and Evaluation. USA.
  • Chen, B., & Qi, X. (2018). Protest response and contingent valuation of an urban forest park in Fuzhou City, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 68-76.
  • CREM (2020). Centro Regional de Estadística de Murcia. Datos municipales. Recuperado de:
  • Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R.,& Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62(1), 47-55.
  • De Ayala, A., Hoyos, D., & Mariel, P. (2015). Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention. Journal of Forest Economics, 21(2), 79-96.
  • Díez, M., Etxano, I., & Garmendia, E. (2015). Evaluating participatory processes in conservation policy and governance: Lessons from a Natura 2000 pilot case study. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 125–138.
  • Fernández, M. A. H., Fernández, R. E. H., & Madueño, J. A. C. (2013). Estimación del valor económico que generan los parques periurbanos de la Sierrezuela y Los Villares en la ciudad de Córdoba, España. Cuadernos Geográficos, 52(1), 178-204.
  • Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H.,& Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3(4), 390-394.
  • González, P. G., Alonso, M. L. S., & Gutiérrez, M. R. V. A. (2016). Analizando los servicios ecosistémicos desde la historia socio-ecológica: El caso de la Huerta de Murcia. Cuadernos Geográficos, 55(1), 198-220.
  • Greene, W.H (1997). Econometric Analysis. New York: Editorial Pearson.
  • Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M.B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V 5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure.Recuperado de
  • Halkos, G., Leonti, A., & Sardianou, E. (2020). Assessing the Preservation of Parks and Natural Protected Areas: A Review of Contingent Valuation Studies. Sustainability, 12(11), 4784.
  • Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hoyos, D., & Mariel, P. (2010). Contingent valuation: Past, present and future. PragueEconomicPapers, 4, 329-343.
  • Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P.A., Montes, C., & Martín-López, B. (2014). Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecological Economics. 108, 36-48.
  • Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A,& Tourangeau, R. (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405.
  • Jorgensen, B. S., & Syme, G. J. (2000). Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological Economics, 33(2), 251-265.
  • Kettunen, M., & ten Brink, P. (2013). Social and economic benefits of protected areas: an assessment guide. Routledge.
  • Lanzas, M., Hermoso, V., de-Miguel, S., Bota, G., & Brotons, L. (2019). Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 541-550.
  • Lee, Y., Kim, H., & Hong, Y. (2016). Revealed Preference and Effectiveness of Public Investment in Ecological River Restoration Projects: An Application of the Count Data Model. Sustainability, 8(4), 353.
  • Lo, A. Y., & Spash, C. L. (2013). Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4), 768-789.
  • Martínez-Paz, J. M., Banos-González, I., Martínez-Fernández, J., & Esteve-Selma, M. Á. (2019). Assessment of management measures for the conservation of traditional irrigated lands: The case of the Huerta of Murcia (Spain). Land Use Policy, 81, 382-391.
  • Martínez-Paz, J., Pellicer-Martínez, F., & Colino, J. (2014). A probabilistic approach for the socioeconomic assessment of urban river rehabilitation projects. Land Use Policy, 36, 468-477.
  • MEA (2005). Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC:Island press.
  • Molina, J. R., y Silva, F. R., & Herrera, M. Á. (2017). Economic vulnerability of fire-prone landscapes in protected natural areas: application in a Mediterranean Natural Park. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(4), 609-624.
  • Mueller, J. M., Soder, A. B., & Springer, A. E. (2019). Valuing attributes of forest restoration in a semi-arid watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning, 184, 78-87.
  • Palomo, I., Montes, C., Martin-Lopez, B., González, J. A., Garcia-Llorente, M., Alcorlo, P., & Mora, M. R. G. (2014). Incorporating the social–ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. BioScience, 64(3), 181-191.
  • Perni, A., Martínez-Carrasco, F., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2011). Valoración económica de la restauración ambiental de lagunas costeras: el Mar Menor (SE España). Ciencias Marinas, 37(2), 175-190.
  • Perni, A., Martínez‐Paz, J., & Martínez‐Carrasco, F. (2012). Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water and Environment Journal, 26(2), 274-284.
  • Perni, A., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2017). Measuring conflicts in the management of anthropized ecosystems: Evidence from a choice experiment in a human-created Mediterranean wetland. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 40-50.
  • Petersen, A. H., Strange, N., Anthon, S., Bjørner, T. B., & Rahbek, C. (2016). Conserving what, where and how? Cost-efficient measures to conserve biodiversity in Denmark. Journal for Nature Conservation, 29, 33-44.
  • Resende, F. M., Fernandes, G. W., Andrade, D. C., & Néder, H. D. (2017). Economic valuation of the ecosystem services provided by a protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado: application of the contingent valuation method. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 77(4), 762-773.
  • Riera, P., Signorello, G., Thiene, M., Mahieu, P. A., Navrud, S., Kaval, P., & Elsasser, P. (2012). Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(4), 259-270.
  • Sarmento, W. M., & Berger, J. (2017). Human visitation limits the utility of protected areas as ecological baselines. Biological Conservation, 212, 316-326.
  • Vásquez, W. F., & de Rezende, C. E. (2018). Willingness to pay for the restoration of the Paraíba do Sul River: A contingent valuation study from Brazil. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 19(4), 610-619.
  • Wilson, K. A., Davis, K. J., Matzek, V., & Kragt, M. E. (2019). Concern about threatened species and ecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 27(3), 513-519.
  • Witt, B. (2019). Tourists’ willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study. Sustainability, 11(11), 3041.