Co-creation of economic value in peri-urban protected areas: Insights from nature conservation and nature-based recreation

  1. Albaladejo García, José Antonio 1
  2. Martínez-Carrasco Pleite, Federico 1
  3. Martínez Paz, José Miguel 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info
    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de Murcia
Journal:
Habitat International

ISSN: 0197-3975

Year of publication: 2025

Volume: 163

Pages: 103462

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2025.103462 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Habitat International

Abstract

The co-creation has proven to be an effective approach for enhancing the quality of decisions through a process of deliberation and collaborative management for protected areas. This approach has the potential to bridge the knowledge gap that often exists between the stakeholders, academic and administrative realms. This work proposes to use a co-creation process to determine the economic value of peri-urban protected areas, one of the most outstanding natural areas where the most drastic land-use changes tend to occur. The growing demand for conserving and visiting peri-urban natural protected areas is leading decision-makers to improve their knowledge of the socioeconomic values of these spaces. To this end, the Sierra Espuña Regional Park (SE-Spain) is employed as a case study to enable the implementation of a three-step process, whereby the social demand for nature conservation and nature-based recreation, and the key challenges and potentials of this peri-urban protected area are identified. The methodology employed was based on a contingent valuation survey and the travel cost method, in addition to a focus group where a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis was conducted. The results demonstrated the usefulness of the co-creation process to improve the knowledge of: the social preference for nature conservation, with a total economic value of 11,301,112 €/year; the recreational activities in nature, with a benefit of 4,921,840 €/year; and the main challenges and potentials of peri-urban areas, highlighting the bureaucracy to carry out the actions and the demand for ecotourism-related services. It therefore justifies the suitability of applying this type of collaborative approach between the academic, stakeholders and decision-makers realms as a preliminary step towards the formulation of more sustainable management measures for the achievement of urban social well-being

Bibliographic References

  • Aggestam, (2020), Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110670
  • Águila, (2018), Dirección General de Medio Natural, pp. 394
  • Albaladejo-García, (2025), Land, 14, pp. 39, 10.3390/land14010039
  • Albaladejo-García, (2025), Landscape and Urban Planning, 257, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105322
  • Albaladejo-García, (2023), Landscape and Urban Planning, 239, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104846
  • Albaladejo-García, (2023), Land Use Policy, 128, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106607
  • Albaladejo-García, (2023), Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria, 119
  • Albaladejo-García, (2021), Cuadernos Geográficos, 60, pp. 212, 10.30827/cuadgeo.v60i3.17754
  • Alcon, (2019), Journal for Nature Conservation, 51, 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125722
  • Alessandro, (2023), Journal of Leisure Research, 54, pp. 26, 10.1080/00222216.2022.2115328
  • Amoako-Tuffour, (2012), Journal of Applied Economics, 15, pp. 25, 10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60002-6
  • Barreiro-Hurle, (2018), Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 18, pp. 79, 10.7201/earn.2018.01.04
  • Bateman, (1993)
  • Benzaghta, (2021), Journal of Global Business Insights, 6, pp. 54, 10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
  • Bockstael, (2007), Vol. 7
  • Bremer, (2017), Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8
  • Campos, (2018), Current Issues in Tourism, 21, pp. 369, 10.1080/13683500.2015.1081158
  • (2022), Espacios Naturales de la Región de Murcia, pp. 73
  • Chambers, (2021), Nature Sustainability, 4, pp. 983, 10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
  • Cheung, (2018), Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 33, pp. 37, 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.004
  • Corsi, (2023), Cities, 137, 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104332
  • Cullinan, (2011), Environmental and Resource Economics, 50, pp. 27, 10.1007/s10640-011-9458-x
  • Da Mota, (2020), Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 30
  • De'Arman, (2020), Environmental Management, 66, pp. 91, 10.1007/s00267-020-01278-5
  • (2010), Europarc Federation
  • Galan, (2023), Global Environmental Change, 78, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102627
  • Grădinaru, (2018), Habitat International, 82, pp. 62, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.005
  • Hakkarainen, (2022), Sustainable Development (Bradford), 30, pp. 309, 10.1002/sd.2276
  • Halkos, (2020), Sustainability (Basel), 12, pp. 4784, 10.3390/su12114784
  • Hennink, (2013)
  • Hensher, (2021), pp. 11
  • Hinson, (2022), People and Nature, 4, pp. 652, 10.1002/pan3.10317
  • John, (2024), Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 58, pp. 96, 10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.11.008
  • Jones, (2018), Systemic design: Theory, methods, and practice, pp. 3, 10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_1
  • Jones-Walters, (2013), Journal for Nature Conservation, 21, pp. 122, 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.006
  • Lamhamedi, (2021), Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 65, 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127339
  • Li, (2015), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, pp. 7396, 10.1073/pnas.1406486112
  • Linstone, (1985), pp. 621
  • López, (2021), Fundación Centro de Estudios Históricos e Investigaciones Locales Región de Murcia
  • Maczka, (2021), Environmental Science & Policy, 117, pp. 16, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.001
  • Madrigal-Martínez, (2025), Cities, 156, 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105519
  • Martínez-Paz, (2021), Land Use Policy, 105, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105426
  • Mayer, (2018), Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 371, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009
  • Moallemi, (2023), Global Environmental Change, 82, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102727
  • Nguyen, (2024), Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103642
  • Norström, (2020), Nature Sustainability, 3, pp. 182, 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
  • Olsen, (2020), Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, pp. 351, 10.1007/s10640-019-00370-7
  • Ordóñez, (2024), Cities, 155
  • Perni, (2021), Ecological Economics, 189, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107144
  • Phelan, (2019), Urban Policy and Research, 37, pp. 215, 10.1080/08111146.2018.1518813
  • Pouso, (2021), Science of the Total Environment, 756, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984
  • Puskás, (2021), Landscape and Urban Planning, 210, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104065
  • Rajendran, (2024), Habitat International, 146, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103041
  • Rocchi, (2020), Land Use Policy, 99, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105094
  • Šafářová, (2021), Habitat International, 118, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102460
  • Schindler, (2022), Applied Geography, 141, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102673
  • Scolozzi, (2014), Journal of Environmental Management, 146, pp. 543, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.040
  • Simončič, (2024), Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 101, 10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128526
  • Soini, (2023), Land Use Policy, 133, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106839
  • Spyra, (2025), Cities, 156, 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105508
  • Talukdar, (2024), Habitat International, 150
  • Whitelaw, (2014), Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22, pp. 584, 10.1080/09669582.2013.873445
  • Wolf, (2017), Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25, pp. 1650, 10.1080/09669582.2017.1302454
  • Wolf, (2019), Environments, 6, pp. 104, 10.3390/environments6090104
  • Wu, (2024), Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
  • Wyborn, (2019), Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, pp. 319, 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103
  • Yoon, (2024), Forest Policy and Economics, 161, 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103184
  • Zabala, (2022), Journal for Nature Conservation, 65, 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126095
  • Zhang, (2021), Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 57, 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126910
  • Žlender, (2020), Cities, 98, 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102579