The geographical factor in the determination of audit quality

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anselin, L. (2001). Spatial econometrics. Baltagi, B. (Ed.) Companion to Theoretical Econometics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
• Bartov, E., Gul, F.A., & Tsui, J.S.L. (2001). Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 421-452.
• Behn, B.K., Choi, J.H., & Kang, T. (2008). Audit quality and the properties of analysts earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 83 (2), 327-349.
• Brauninger, M., & Nieburh, A. (2005). Agglomeration, spatial interaction and convergence in the EU. HWWA Discussion paper, 322. Hamburg.
• Broye, G., & Weill, L. (2008). Does leverage influence audit choice? A cross-country analysis. Applied Financial Economics, 18 (9), 715-731
• Carcello, J.V., & Nagy. A.L. (2004). Client size, audit specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19 (5), 651-668.
• Chaney, P.K., Jeter, D.C., & Shivakumar, L. (2004). Self-selection of audits and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review, 79 (1), 51-72.
• Ciccone, A. (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, 46 (2), 213-227.
• Colbert, G., & Murray, D. (1998). The association between auditor quality and auditor size: An analysis of small CPA firms. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13, 135-350.
• Cravens, K.S., Flagg, J.C., & Glover, H.D. (1994). A comparison of client characteristics by auditor attributes: implications for the auditor selection process. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9 (3), 27-36.
• Dall'erba, S. (2007). Productivity convergence and spatial dependence among Spanish regions. Journal of Geographical System, 7, 207-227.
• Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M., & Patel, A. (1999). Bank monitoring and the pricing of corporate public debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 435-449
• De Angelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1, 113-127.
• Doogar, R., & Easley, R. (1998). Concentration without differentiation: A new look at the determinants of audit market concentration. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, 235-253.
• Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (1999). The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review, 89 (2), 311-316.
• Fargher, N., Taylor, M.H., & Simon, D.T. (2001). The demand for audit reputation across international markets for audit services. The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 407-433.
• Ferguson, A., & Stokes, D. (2002). Brand name audit pricing, industry specialization, and leadership premiums post-big 8 and big 6 mergers. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (1), 77-110.
• Feroz, E.H., Park, K., & Pastena, V.S. (1991). The financial and market effects of the SEC's accounting and auditing enforcement releases. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 107-129.
• Florax, R., & Folmer, H. (1995). Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models. Monte Carlo evaluation of the pre-test estimators. Regional science and urban economics, 22, 404-432.
• Francis, J.R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality. The Bristish Accounting Review, 36 (4), 345-368.
• Francis, J.R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16 (1), 135-165.
• Francis, J.R., & Wilson, E. (1988). Auditor changes a joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review, 4, 663-682.
• Gómez, N., Ruiz, E., De Fuentes, C., & García, M. (2004). Audit quality and the going concern decision making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 13 (4), 597-620.
• Greene, W. (2008). Econometric Analysis, 5th Ed. Pearson International Edition.
• Guedhami, O., & Pittman, J.A. (2006). Ownership concentration in privatized firms: the role of disclosure standards, audit choice, and auditing infrastructure. Journal of Accounting Research, 44 (5), 889-929.
• Guedhami O., Pittman J.A., & Saffar W. (2009). Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48 (2), 151-171
• Hope, O.K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yoo, Y.K. (2008). Culture and audit choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27 (5), 357-73.
• Huang, R.D., & Li, H. (2009). Does the market dole out collective punishment? an empirical analysis of industry, geography, and Arthur Andersen's reputation. Journal of banking & finance, 33 (7), 1255-1265
• Kane, G.D., & Velury, U. (2004). The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 976-983.
• Kang M.P., Mahoney, J.T, & Tan, D. (2009). Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: the case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2), 117-135.
• Khurana, I., & Raman, K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79 (2), 473-495.
• Krugman, P. (1991). Target zones and exchange rate dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 669-682.
• Lennox, C. (2000). Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 321-337.
• Louis, H. (2005). Acquirers' abnormal returns and the non-big 4 audit clientele effect. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 75-99.
• Mansi, S.A., Maxwell, W.F., & Miller, D.P. (2004). Does audit quality and tenure matter to investors? evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research, 42 (4), 755-793.
• Maté, M.L., García, D., & López, F. (2009). Spatial effects in the productivity convergence of Spanish industrial SME's. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 141, 13-36
• Moizer, P. (1997). Auditor reputation: the international empirical evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 1 (1), 61-74.
• Mur, J., López, F.A., & Angulo A. (2009). Instability and convergence between the European regions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 12 (3), 259-280.
• Nair, R.D., & Rittenberg, L.E. (1987). Messages perceived from audit, review and compilation reports: Extension to more diverse groups. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7 (1), 15-38.
• Carrera, N., Gutiérrez. I., & Carmona, S. (2005). Concentración en el mercado de auditoría en España. análisis empírico del período 1990-2000. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 34 (125), 423-458
• Niskanen, M., Karjalainen, J., & Niskanen, J. (2010). The role of auditing in small private family firms: is it about quality and credibility? Family Business Review, 23 (3), 230-45.
• Palmrose, Z. (1988). An analysis of auditors litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63, 55-73.
• Piot, C., (2001). Agency costs and audit quality: Evidence from France. European Accounting Review, 10 (3), 461-499.
• Reynolds, J.K., & Francis, J.R. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office -level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 375-400.
• Rob, R., & Fishman, A. (2005). Is bigger better? customer base expansion through word-ofmouth reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 113 (5), 1146-1162.
• Rollins, T.P., & Bremser, W.G. (1997). The Sec's enforcement actions against auditors: An auditor reputation and institutional theory perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8, 191-206.
• Ruiz, E., Gómez, N., & Guiral, A., (2002). An intersectoral and size comparation of the quality of the accounting information through audit reports. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 112, 545-581.
• Sainty, B.J., Taylor, G.K., & Williams, D.D. (2002). Investor dissatisfaction toward audits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 17 (2), 111-137.
• Shocley, R., & Holt, R. (1983). A behavioral investigation of supplier differentiation in the market for audit services. Journal of Accounting Research, 21 (2), 545-564.
• Sucher, P., Moizer, P., & Zarova, M. (1999). The images of the Big Six audit firms in the Czech Republic. The European Accounting Review, 8 (3), 499-521.
• Sundgren, S. (1998). Auditor choices and auditor reporting practices: Evidence from Finnish small firms. The European Accounting Review, 7 (3), 443-465.
• Vanstraelen, A. (2000). Impact of renewable long-term audit mandates on audit quality. European Accounting Review, 9, 419-442
• Wang, Q., Wong, T.J., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and audit choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46 (1), 112-134.
• Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (4), 721-744.