El contrato de entrada en el capital riesgo y la Teoría Institucional en el contexto español

Referencias bibliográficas

• ANUARIO ASCRI 2003 (Asociación Española de Entidades de Capital Riesgo).
• BRANDER, J.; EGAN, E.; HELLMANN, T. (2009). Government Sponsored versus Private Venture Capital: Canadian Evidence. In Lerner, J. and Shoar, A. (ed.) International Differences in Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.
• BRUTON, G.D.; FRIED, V.H.; MANIGART, S. (2005). Institutional Influences on the Worldwide Expansion of Venture Capital. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(6): 737-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00106.x
• BRUTON, G.D.; AHLSTROM, D.; HAN-LIN, L. (2010). Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34: 421-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
• CORNELIUS, B.; HARGREAVES, C. (1991). The Role of Covenants in Venture Capital Investment Agreements. Working paper. University of New England.
• CORNELIUS, B. (2005). The institutionalisation of venture capital. Technovation, 25(6): 599-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.001
• CUMMING, D.J.; MACINTOSH, J. (2006). Crowding Out Private Equity: Canadian Evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 21: 569-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.323821
• DEL-PALACIO, I.; ZHANG, X.T.; SOLE, F. (2012). The capital gap for small technology companies: Public venture capital to the rescue? Small Business Economics, 38(3): 283- 301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9275-6
• DIMAGGIO, P.J.; POWELL, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101
• DIMAGGIO, P. (2001). Conclusion: The futures of business organization and paradoxes of change. In P. DiMaggio (ed.). The twenty-first century firm, 210-243. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• DOH, J.P.; GUAY, T.R. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1): 47-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x
• ELANGO, B.; FRIED, V.; HISRICH, R.; POLONCHEK, A. (1995). How Venture Capital Firms Differ. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2): 157-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00019-Q
• FRUMKIN, P.; GELASKIEWICZ, J. (2004). Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3): 283-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh028
• HOFFMAN, A.J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351-371. Available at: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0001-4273%28199908%2942%3A4%3C351%3AIEACEA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257008
• HYYTINEN, A.; TOIVANEN, O. (2003). Asymmetric Information and the Market Structure of the Venture Capital Industry. Journal of Financial Services Research, 23(3): 241-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024623729622
• ISAKSSON, A.; CORNELIUS, B.; LANDSTRöM, H.; JUNGHAGEN, S. (2004). Institutional theory and contracting in venture capital: the Swedish experience. Venture Capital, 6(1): 47-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369106042000175582
• JENG, L.A.; WELLS, P.C. (2000). The determinants of venture capital funding: evidence across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6: 241-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.103948
• JOG, V.; LAWSON, W.; RIDING, A. (1991). The Venture Capitalist/Entrepreneur Interface: Expectations, Conflicts and Contracts. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 8(2): 5-20.
• KLAUSNER, M.; LITVAK, K. (2001). What Economists have taught us about Venture Capital Contracting. Working Paper, Stanford Law School. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.280024
• MUNARI, F.; TOSCHI, L. (2010). Assessing the impact of public venture capital programmes in the United Kingdom: do regional characteristics matter? European Financial Management Symposium. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539384
• NORTH, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
• RUHNKA, J.C.; YOUNG, J.E. (1987). A venture capital model of the development process for new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 2: 167-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90006-1
• RUHNKA, J.C.; YOUNG, J.E. (1991). Some hypotheses about risk in venture capital investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(2): 115-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90014-5
• SCOTT, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• SUCHMAN, M.C. (1995). Localism and globalism in institutional analysis: the emergence of contractual norms in venture finance. In Scott, W. and Christensen, S., The Institutional Construction of Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• TYKVOVÁ, T. (2007). What do economists tell us about Venture capital contracts? Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 65-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00272.x
• ZACHARAKIS, A.; MEYER, G. (1998). A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 57-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00004-9