Designing an Environmental Zone in a Mediterranean City to Support City Logistics

  1. Ros-McDonnell, Lorenzo
  2. de-la-Fuente-Aragon, María Victoria
  3. Ros-McDonnell, Diego
  4. Cardós Carboneras, Manuel
Revue:
International Journal of Production Management and Engineering (IJPME)

ISSN: 2340-4876 2340-5317

Année de publication: 2018

Volumen: 6

Número: 1

Pages: 1-9

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4995/IJPME.2018.8771 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: International Journal of Production Management and Engineering (IJPME)

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

European cities are facing enormous challenges in accessibility and livability terms due to several European directives, which are compulsory in the mid/long term, traffic congestion levels are still increasing, and air pollution and noise disturbs citizens’ lives. This work presents the study carried out in a Mediterranean city to define an Environmental Zone with traffic restrictions for vehicles in the historical centre of the city of Cartagena (Spain) by exploring different urban logistics measures to tackle main problems caused by freight deliveries and pickups in the city centre. These solutions aimed to enhance the efficiency of vehicles, and to reduce both traffic congestion the environmental impacts caused by freight delivery in the city in order to improve urban sustainability.

Références bibliographiques

  • Allen, J., Brown, M. (2008). Review of survey techniques used in urban freight studies. London: Transport studies group, University of Westminster.
  • Allen, J., Wild, D. (2008). Environmental Zones in European Cities. In D1.4 BESTUFFS Policy and Research Recommendations IV, Best Urban Freight Solutions II, Co-ordination Action, Priority 1.6.2. Sustainable Surface Transport.
  • Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
  • Browne, M., Allen, J., Nemoto, T., Patier, D., Visser, J. (2012) Reducing social and environmental impacts of urban freight transport: A review of some major cities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.088
  • Bulkeley, H., Betsill, M.M. (2005). Rethink sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
  • Childers, D.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Grove, J.M, Ogden, L., Whitmer, A. (2014). Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: challenges and opportunities. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
  • Crawford, J. (2000). Carfree cities. Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Books.
  • Dablanc, L. (2008). Urban goods movement and air quality policy and regulation issues in European cities. Journal of Environmental Law, 20(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn005
  • De la Fuente, M.V., Ros-McDonnell, D., Nyerges, L., Bajor, P., Ros-McDonnell, L. (2015). Analysis of Logistics Flows in an Urban Functional Area. Application to Cartagena. 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management, Aveiro (Portugal).
  • Dotter, F. (2015). Cleaner, safer and more efficient freight transport in cities. Civitas Insight, 3, November 2015.
  • Engwicht, D. (1999). Street reclaiming: Creating livable streets and vibrant communities. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
  • EU-COM (2011). Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. White Paper. European Commission, Brussels.
  • Geerling, H., Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy, 10, 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00020-9
  • Geroliminis, N, & Daganzo C. (2005). A review of green logistics schemes used in cities around the world. Working paper UCB-ITS-VWP-2005-5. eScholarship. University of California.
  • Lindholm, M. (2012). How local authority decision makers address freight transport in the urban area. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.096
  • Newman, P., Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
  • PEOPCH (2005). Plan Especial de Ordenación y Protección del Conjunto Histórico. Memoria justificativa y explicativa. Ayuntamiento de Cartagena.
  • PEMC (2017) Plan Estratégico M17 del Municipio de Cartagena. Ayuntamiento de Cartagena, Mayo 2017.
  • Pulawska, S., Starowicz, W. (2014). Ecological urban logistics in the historical centers of cities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.026
  • Quak, H.J. (2015). Access Restrictions and Local Authorities’ City Logistics Regulation in Urban Areas. In: City Logistics, Mapping the Future. Ed. CRC Press.
  • Russo, F., Comi, A. (2012) City characteristics and urban goods movements: A way to environmental transportation system in a sustainable city. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091
  • Southworth, M. (2003). Measuring the livable city. Built. Environ., 29(4), 3343-3354. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.29.4.343.54293
  • Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. J. Urban Plann. Dev.,131(4), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
  • Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R.G., Yamada, T. (1999). Modelling city logistics. Ed. Institute of Systems Science Research, Kyoto.
  • Taniguchi , E. (2014). Concepts of city logistics for sustainable and liveable cities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.029
  • Van Rooijen, T., Quak, H. (2014). City Logistics in the European CIVITAS Initiative. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1476
  • Witkowski, J., Kiba-Janiak, M. (2014). The role of local governments in the development of city logistics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1481