Multibusiness firms and performance in ItalyWhat role does relatedness play?

  1. Maurizio La Rocca 1
  2. Tiziana La Rocca 2
  3. F. Javier Sánchez Vidal 3
  1. 1 University of Calabria
    info

    University of Calabria

    Cosenza, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/02rc97e94

  2. 2 University of Messina
    info

    University of Messina

    Mesina, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/05ctdxz19

  3. 3 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 24

Número: 2

Páginas: 63-70

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEEN.2018.01.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper evaluates the effect of diversification strategy on corporate value for a sample of Italian companies. It accounts for both the level of diversification and relatedness components. Empirical analyses show a U-shaped curvilinear relationship between diversification and value. In contrast to the mainstream literature, our results highlight that related diversification has a negative effect, while unrelated diversification is a value-creating strategy.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1958). A model for diversification. Management Science, 4(4), 392–414.
  • Barca, F., & Becht, M. (2001). The control of corporate Europe, European Corporate Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.
  • Bergh, D. D. (1997). Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: An integrative model of ex-ante conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 715–731.
  • Bianco, M., & Casavola, P. (1999). Italian corporate governance: Effects on financial structure and firm performance. European Economic Review, 43(4–6),1057–1069.
  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
  • Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal ofFinance, 57(4), 1731–1762.
  • Carpenter, R., & Rondi, L. (2000). Italian corporate governance, investment and finance. Empirica, 27(4), 365–388.
  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (1999). Corporate diversification in East Asia: The role of ultimate ownership and group affiliation. Working paper. World Bank.
  • Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1991). Diversification and performance: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management Studies,28(5), 529–558.
  • Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 135–160.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problem and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–350.
  • Fauver, L., Houston, J., & Naranjo, A. (2003). Capital market development, international integration, legal systems, and the value of corporate diversification: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1),135–157.
  • Fuente, G., & Velasco, P. (2015). The effect of the financial crisis on the value of corporate diversification in Spanish firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 44(1), 1–23.
  • Gertner, R., Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. (1994). Internal versus external capital markets.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1211–1230.
  • Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and integration in American industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972–84. Academy ofManagement Journal, 31(4), 771–801.
  • He, X. (2009). Corporate diversification and firm value: Evidence from post-1997data. International Review of Finance, 12(4), 359–385.
  • He, X. (2012). Two sides of a coin: Endogenous and exogenous effects of corporate diversification on firm value. International Review of Finance, 9(4), 375–394.
  • Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Galve-Górriz, C. (2017). Diversification and family control as determinants of performance: A study of listed business groups. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 46–54.
  • Hoechle, D., Schmid, M., Walter, I., & Yermack, D. (2012). How much of the diversification discount can be explained by poor corporate governance? Journal ofFinancial Economics, 103(1), 41–60.
  • Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (1990). Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management, 16(2), 461–509.
  • Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1998). A re-examination of the conglomerate merger wave in the 1960s: An internal capital markets view. Journal of Finance, 54(3),1131–1151.
  • Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. L. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 159–172.
  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.
  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2),867–891.
  • Kim, E. H., & McConnell, J. J. (1977). Corporate mergers and the coinsurance of corporate debt. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 349–365.
  • Kuppuswamy, V., & Villalonga, B. (2016). Does diversification create value in the presence of external financing constraints? Evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Management Science, 62(4), 905–923.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
  • Lamont, O. (1997). Cash flow and investment: Evidence from internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 83–109.
  • Lamont, O., & Polk, C. (2000). Does diversification destroy value? Evidence from industry stocks. Working paper. University of Chicago.
  • Lang, L. H. P., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280.
  • Lewellen, W. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger activity. Journal of Finance, 26(2), 521–537.
  • Lins, K., & Servaes, H. (1999). International evidence on the value of corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2215–2239.
  • Lins, K., & Servaes, H. (2002). Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets? Financial Management, 31(2), 5–31.
  • Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2),149–165.
  • Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. (1996). Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2),340–367.
  • Markides, C. C. (1996). Diversification, refocusing and economic performance. London: MIT Press.
  • Martin, K. J., & Sayrak, A. (2003). Corporate diversification and shareholder value: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(1), 37–57.
  • Matsusaka John, G. (2001). Corporate diversification, value maximization and organizational capabilities. The Journal of Business, 74(3), 409–431.
  • Menéndez-Alonso, E. J. (2003). Does diversification strategy matter in explainingcapital structure? Some evidence from Spain. Applied Financial Economics, 13(6),427–430.
  • Nayyar, P. (1992). On the measurement of corporate diversification strategy: Evidence from large U.S. service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3),219–235.
  • Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 239–255.
  • Palich, L., Cardinal, L., & Miller, C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174.
  • Panzar, J., & Willig, R. (1981). Economies of scope. American Economic Review, 71(2),268–272.
  • Prowse, S. (1990). Institutional investment patterns and corporate financial behavior in the United States and Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 43–66.
  • Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and in efficient investment. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 35–80.
  • Ramanujam, V., & Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523–551.
  • Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (2000). The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance, 55(6),2537–2564.
  • Servaes, H. (1996). The value of diversification during the conglomerate merger wave. Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1201–1225.
  • Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Journal Management, 11(2), 99–115.
  • Stein, J. (1997). Internal capital markets and competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 111–133.
  • Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1),179–196.
  • Villalonga, B. (2004a). Does diversification cause the diversification discount? Financial Management, 33(2), 5–27.
  • Villalonga, B. (2004b). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 475–502.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: The Free Press
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet