Hacia un enfoque espacial multidimensional para analizar los cambios geográficos en la sostenibilidad de la pesca: un estudio de caso en el Campo de Cartagena-Mar Menor

  1. Simón Hernández Aguado
  2. Ignacio Segado Segado
  3. María Eugenia Sánchez Vidal
Journal:
BAGE. Boletín de la Asociación Española de Geografía

ISSN: 0212-9426,  2605-3322

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 85

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21138/BAGE.2899 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: BAGE. Boletín de la Asociación Española de Geografía

Abstract

Para avanzar hacia un análisis más efectivo del desarrollo sostenible que permita cumplir los objetivos de la Agenda 2030, se requiere de nuevas herramientas de evaluación para comprender mejor la variación espacial en los factores que contribuyen a su principal meta: mejorar y conservar el bienestar humano. En esta investigación tomamos dos comunidades de pescadores situadas en el litoral del Campo de Cartagena-Mar Menor (Región de Murcia, sureste español) como caso de estudio. Para comprender como el desarrollo sostenible puede promover efectivamente el bienestar, utilizamos un enfoque espacial multidimensional que estudia el cambio social y ambiental, y que puede aportar información valiosa para los procesos de toma de decisiones. Para avanzar en este objetivo, se crearon dos índices multi-dimensionales que permiten analizar espacialmente el estado de las comunidades de pescadores basados en los marcos de los medios de vida sostenibles y del bienestar social. Los resultados indican que existe una considerable variabilidad espacial en los factores que afectan al bienestar de los pescadores en la región estudiada, así como en el impacto de la política de pesca en la protección y seguridad de sus medios de vida. Estos hallazgos indican la necesidad de evaluar el desarrollo sostenible de la pesca en términos de bienestar a niveles apropiados de agregación espacial.

Bibliographic References

  • Aguado, S. H., Segado, I. S., & Pitcher, T. J. (2016). Towards sustainable fisheries: A multi-criteria participatory approach to assessing indicators of sustainable fishing communities: A case study from Cartagena (Spain). Marine Policy, 65, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.024
  • Allison, E. H., & Horemans, B. (2006). Putting the principles of the sustainable livelihoods approach into fisheries development policy and practice. Marine policy, 30(6), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.001
  • Apine, E., Turner, L. M., Rodwell, L. D., & Bhatta, R. (2019). The application of the sustainable livelihood approach to small scale-fisheries: The case of mud crab Scylla serrata in South west India. Ocean & coastal management, 170, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.12.024
  • Atela, J. O., Minang, P. A., Quinn, C. H., & Duguma, L. A. (2015). Implementing REDD+ at the local level: Assessing the key enablers for credible mitigation and sustainable livelihood outcomes. Journal of environmental management, 157, 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.015
  • Bavinck, M., Berkes, F., Charles, A., Dias, A. C. E., Doubleday, N., Nayak, P., & Sowman, M. (2017). The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation–a global reconnaissance. Maritime studies, 16(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0062-8
  • Berkes, F., & Nayak, P. K. (2018). Role of communities in fisheries management:“one would first need to imagine it”. Maritime studies, 17(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0120-x
  • Blasiak, R., & Wabnitz, C. C. (2018). Aligning fisheries aid with international development targets and goals. Marine Policy, 88, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.018
  • Britton, E., & Coulthard, S. (2013). Assessing the social wellbeing of Northern Ireland's fishing society using a three-dimensional approach. Marine Policy, 37, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.011
  • Brueckner-Irwin, I., Armitage, D., & Courtenay, S. (2019). Applying a social-ecological well-being approach to enhance opportunities for marine protected area governance. Ecology and Society, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10995-240307
  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “our common future". United Nations.
  • Castejón-Porcel, G., Espín-Sánchez, D., Ruiz-Álvarez, V., García-Marín, R., & Moreno-Muñoz, D. (2018). Runoff water as a resource in the Campo de Cartagena (Region of Murcia): current possibilities for use and benefits. Water, 10(4), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040456
  • Chan, C., Armitage, D., Alexander, S. M., & Campbell, D. (2019). Examining linkages between ecosystem services and social wellbeing to improve governance for coastal conservation in Jamaica. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100997
  • Charles, A., Allison, E. H., Chuenpagdee, R., & Mbatha, P. (2012). Well-Being and fishery governance. In Visible Possibilities: The Economics of Sustainable Fisheries, Aquaculture and Seafood Trade. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, July 16–20, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Edited by Ann L. Shriver. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), Corvallis. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/35110
  • Chuenpagdee, R., Charles, A., & Johnson, D. (2012). Broadening the Scope in Fisheries Governance with a Wellbeing Lens. In Visible Possibilities: The Economics of Sustainable Fisheries, Aquaculture and Seafood Trade. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, July 16–20, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Edited by Ann L. Shriver. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), Corvallis. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/43672
  • Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2018). Transforming the governance of small-scale fisheries. Maritime studies, 17(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0087-7
  • Coulthard, S., Johnson, D., & McGregor, J. A. (2011). Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing: a social wellbeing approach to the global fisheries crisis. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.003
  • CARM (2006). Plan Estratégico del sector agroalimentario de la Región de Murcia. Análisis del sector de la pesca y la acuicultura. Retrieved from https://www.carm.es/web/integra.servlets.Blob?ARCHIVO=2.9%20Pesca.pdf&TABLA=ARCHIVOS&CAMPOCLAVE=IDARCHIVO&VALORCLAVE=21011&CAMPOIMAGEN=ARCHIVO&IDTIPO=60&RASTRO=c1416$m4582
  • CREM (2016). Estadísticas de Pesca. Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca de la Región de Murcia. Centro Regional de Estadística de Murcia. Retrieved from http://econet.carm.es/web/crem/inicio/-/crem/sicrem/PU590/Indice58.html
  • Donohue, C., & Biggs, E. (2015). Monitoring socio-environmental change for sustainable development: Developing a Multidimensional Livelihoods Index (MLI). Applied Geography, 62, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.006
  • Erenstein, O. (2007). Livelihoods, poverty and targeting in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: A spatial mapping approach. CIMMYT.
  • FAO (2016). El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/I9540es/i9540es.pdf
  • GALPEMUR (2015). Informe y Resultados. Foro Participativo GALPEMUR. Grupo de Acción Local de Pesca y Acuicultura de la Región de Murcia. Retrieved from http://galpemur.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/119158-Galpemur-Foro-Participativo-1.pdf
  • GALPEMUR (2017). Estrategia de Desarrollo Local Participativa de GALPEMUR. Grupo de Acción Local de Pesca y Acuicultura de la Región de Murcia. Retrieved from http://galpemur.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EDLP_GALPEMUR.pdf
  • Ha, T. T. P., van Dijk, H., Bosma, R., & Sinh, L. X. (2013). Livelihood capabilities and pathways of shrimp farmers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquaculture economics & management, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2013.747224
  • Herrera-Racionero, P., Lizcano-Fernández, E., & Miret-Pastor, L. (2015). “Us” and “them”. Fishermen from Gandía and the loss of institutional legitimacy. Marine Policy, 54, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.018
  • Islam, G. M. N., Yew, T. S., Abdullah, N. M. R., & Viswanathan, K. K. (2011). Social capital, community based management, and fishers’ livelihood in Bangladesh. Ocean & coastal management, 54(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.026
  • Islam, M. M., & Shamsuddoha, M. (2018). Coastal and marine conservation strategy for Bangladesh in the context of achieving blue growth and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Environmental science & policy, 87, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.014
  • Lienert, J., & Burger, P. (2015). Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07405-200220
  • McGregor, A., & Sumner, A. (2010). Beyond business as usual: what might 3‐D wellbeing contribute to MDG momentum? IDS Bulletin, 41(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00111.x
  • McGregor, J. A. (2008). Wellbeing, poverty and conflict. Briefing paper, 1(08).
  • Menchón, M. M., & Alonso, M. S. (2007). El agua en el Campo de Cartagena. Revista Murciana de Antropología, (14), 47–61.
  • Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2019). Interplay between local and global: Change processes and small-scale fisheries. In Transdisciplinarity for Small-Scale Fisheries Governance (pp. 203–220). Springer, Cham.
  • O´Malley, A. H. (2011). Critical social analysis and development. In The critical Development Studies Handbook: Tools for Change (pp. 138-146). PlutoPress and Halifax & Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing, London & New York.
  • Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2019). Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the complexities of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for countries in the Gulf of Guinea. Marine Policy, 99, 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.016
  • Paz, Á. C. (2010). Percepción cooperativa de las cofradías de pescadores: un estudio empírico. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, (103), 7–32.
  • Pollnac, R. B., Pomeroy, R. S., & Harkes, I. H. (2001). Fishery policy and job satisfaction in three southeast Asian fisheries. Ocean & Coastal Management, 44(7–8), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00064-3
  • Stanford, R. J., Wiryawan, B., Bengen, D. G., Febriamansyah, R., & Haluan, J. (2017). The fisheries livelihoods resilience check (FLIRES check): A tool for evaluating resilience in fisher communities. Fish and fisheries, 18(6), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12220
  • Symes, D., & Phillipson, J. (2009). Whatever became of social objectives in fisheries policy? Fisheries Research, 95(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2008.08.001
  • Trimble, M., & Johnson, D. (2013). Artisanal fishing as an undesirable way of life? The implications for governance of fishers' wellbeing aspirations in coastal Uruguay and southeastern Brazil. Marine Policy, 37, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.002
  • Weeratunge, N., Béné, C., Siriwardane, R., Charles, A., Johnson, D., Allison, E. H., .... Badjeck, M. C. (2014). Small‐scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish and Fisheries, 15(2), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12016
  • White, S. C. (2009). Bringing wellbeing into development practice. Wellbeing in Developing Countries (Research Group Working Paper, 9, 50). Retrieved from https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/files/334487/WeDWP_09_50.pdf
  • White, S. C. (2008, April). But what is wellbeing? A framework for analysis in social and development policy and practice. In Conference on regeneration and wellbeing: research into practice. University of Bradford (Vol. 2425). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sarah_White24/publication/241141227_But_What_is_Wellbeing_A_Framework_for_Analysis_in_Social_and_Development_Policy_and_Practice/links/550de2890cf212874167726d/But-What-is-Wellbeing-A-Framework-for-Analysis-in-Social-and-Development-Policy-and-Practice.pdf
Data source: Dialnet