An investigation of the relationship between job characteristics and the gender wage gap
- JAUME GARCÍA 1
- PEDRO JESÚS HERNÁNDEZ 2
- ANGEL LÓPEZ NICOLÁS 3
-
1
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
info
-
2
Universidad de Murcia
info
-
3
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
info
ISSN: 1575-605X
Ano de publicación: 2013
Título do exemplar: Serie Monografías. Métodos cuantitativos e informática
Volume: 4
Número: 1
Páxinas: 281-292
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA
Resumo
This paper re-examines gender wage differences, taking into account not only worker characteristics but also job characteristics. Consideration of a wide set of “job quality” indicators can explain a fraction of the wage gap that would otherwise be attributed to pure wage discrimination. In any case, the fraction of the wage gap that remains associated to differential rewards for identical factors across sexes is still substantial. Our results suggest that in order to avoid overestimation of the fraction of the wage gap attributable to discrimination, it is necessary to control for job characteristics.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Bayard, K., Hellerstein, J., Neumark, D. and Troske, K. (1999): “New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employee-Employer Data”, NBER Working Paper No. W7003.
- Blinder, A.S. (1973): “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates”, Journal of Human Resources, 8: 436-55.
- Carabaña, J. et al. (1992): “Encuesta de Estructura, Conciencia y Biografía de Clase: Informe Técnico”, Documento de Trabajo, Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, Consejería de Economía.
- De la Rica, S. and Ugidos, A. (1995): “¿Son las diferencias en capital humano determinantes de las diferencias salariales observadas entre hombres y mujeres?, Investigaciones Económicas, 19: 395-414.
- De la Rica, S. and Felgueroso, F. (2001): “Intrafirm gender wage differences: A worker’s matching approach”. Mimeo.
- Dolton, P.J., Makepeace, G.H. and Van Der Klaauw, W. (1989): “Occupational Choice and Earnings Determination: The Role of Sample Selection and Non-Pecuniary Factors”, Oxford Economic Papers, 41: 573-94.
- Heckman, J. (1979): “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, 47: 153-61.
- Hernández, P.J. (1996): “Segregación ocupacional de la mujer y discriminación salarial”, Revista de Economía Aplicada, 11: 57-80.
- Johnson, G. and Solon, G. (1986): “Estimates of the Direct Effects of Comparable Worth Policy”, American Economic Review, 76: 1117-25.
- Lee, L.F. (1983): “Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity”, Econometrica, 51: 507-12.
- Méndez, I. and Hernández, P.J. (2001): Labour supply, sample selection and wage discrimination, 13th EALE Annual Conference, 13-16 September 2001.
- Macpherson, D.A. and Hirsch, B.T. (1995): “Wages and Gender Composition: Why Do Women’s Jobs Pay Less?”, Journal of Labor Economics, 13(3): 426-71.
- Miller, P. (1987a): “Gender Differences in Observed and Offered Wages in Canada, 1980”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 20: 225-44.
- Miller, P. (1987b): “The Wage Effect of the Occupational Segregation of Women in Britain”, Economic Journal, 97: 885-96.
- Neuman, S. and Oaxaca, R.L. (1998): “Estimating Labor Market Discrimination with Selectivity Corrected Wage Equations: Methodological Considerations and An Illustration from Israel”. Mimeo.
- Neumark, D. (1988): “Employers Discriminatory Behavior and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination”, Journal of Human Resources, 23: 279-95.
- Oaxaca, R. (1973): “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labour Markets”, International Economic Review, 14: 693-709.
- Reilly, B. (1991): “Occupational Segregation and Selectivity Bias in Occupational Wage Equations: an Empirical Analysis Using Irish Data”, Applied Economics, 23:1-7.
- Sorensen, E. (1990): “The Crowding Hypothesis and Comparable Worth”, Journal of Human Resources, 25: 55-89.
- Trost, R.P. and Lee, L.F. (1984): “Technical Training and Earnings: a Polychotomous Choice Model with Selectivity”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 66:151-56.