Política y gestión financiera municipal

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abizadeh, S. y Gray, J. (1993), “Provincial Government Spending in Canada: An Empirical Analysis”, International Review of Applied Economics, 7: 69-90.
• Adams, R.D. (1977), “Individual Preferences as Supply Determinants in the Municipal and Federal Bond Markets”, Public Finance Quarterly, 5 (2): 175-202.
• Alesina, A. y Rosenthal, H. (1994), Partisan Politics, Divided Governments, and the Economy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Allers, M., De Haan, J. y Sterks, C. (2001), “Partisan influence on the local tax burden in the Netherlands”, Public Choice, 106: 351–63.
• Arellano, M. y Honoré, B, (2000), “Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments”, Working Paper nº 0016, Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros, Madrid.
• Arellano, M. (1993), “On the Testing of Correlated Effects with Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 59 (1-2): 87-97.
• Arellano, M. y Bover, O. (1990), “La Econometría de Datos de Panel.”, Investigaciones Económicas, XIV (1): 3-45.
• Ashworth, J.; Geys, B. y Heyndels, B. (2005), “Government Weakness and Local Public Debt Development in Flemish Municipalities”, International Tax and Public Finance, 12: 395-422.
• Benito, B. y Bastida, F. (2004), “The determinants of the municipal debt policy in Spain”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 16(4), 525-58.
• Benoit, K. y Laver, M. (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies, Ed. Routledge, London. Bird, R.M. (1970), “The Growth of Government Spending in Canada”, Canadian Tax Papers nº. 51, July.
• Blais, A. y Nadeau, R. (1992), “The Electoral Budget Cycle”, Public Choice, 74 (4): 389-403.
• Blais, A.; Blake, D. y Dion, S. (1993), “Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies”, American Journal of Political Science, 37(1): 40-62.
• Blejer, M.I. y Cheasty, A. (1991), “The Measurement of Fiscal Deficits: Analytical and Methodological Sigues”, Journal of Economic Literature, 29(4): 1644-78.
• Borge, L. (1995), “Economic and political determinants of fee income in Norwegian local governments”, Public Choice, 83: 353-73. _ (2005), “Strong politicians, small deficits: evidence from Norwegian local governments”, European Journal of Political Economy, 21: 325–44. _;
• Rattsø, J. y Sørensen, R. (1995), “Local government service production: The politics of allocative sluggishness”, Public Choice, 82: 135-57. Bosch, N. y Suarez-Pandiello, J. (1995), “Seven hypotheses about public choice and local spending: A test for Spanish municipalities”, Public Finance, 50: 36–50.
• Brown, K.W. (1996), “Trends in Key Ratios Using the GFOA Financial Indicators Databases 1989-1993”, Government Finance Review, 12 (6): 30-4.
• Brown, T. (2000), “Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limitation in Colorado: The Impact on Municipal Governments”, Public Budgeting and Finance, 20 (3): 29-50.
• Buchanan, J.M. (1967), Public Finance in Democratic Process, Fiscal institutions and Individual Choice, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
• Castles, F.G. y Mair, P. (1984), “Left-right political scales: some ‘expert’ judgements”, European Journal of Political Research, 12: 73-88.
• Castles, F.G. y McKinlay, R.D. (1979), ”Does politics matter: An analysis of the public welfare commitment in advanced democratic states”, European Journal of Political Research, 7: 169-86.
• Clark, T.N. (1994), “Municipal Fiscal Strain: Indicators and Causes”, Government Finance Review, 10 (3): 27-9.
• Collins, R.A. (1977), “Optimality in Municipal Debt”, Public Finance Quarterly, 5 (1): 117-26.
• Cropf, R.A. y Wendel, G.D. (1998), “The Determinants of Municipal Debt Policy: a Pooled TimeSeries Analysis”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 16 (2): 211-24.
• Cusack, T.R. (1997), “Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989”, Public Choice, 91: 375–95.
• Dahlberg, M. y Johansson, E. (1998), “The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus: Panel Data Evidence from Swedish Municipalities”, Applied Economics, 30 (10): 1379-86.
• De Haan, J. y Sturm, J.E. (1997), “Political and economic determinants of OECD budget deficits and government expenditures: a reinvestigation”, European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 739-50.
• De Haan, J.; Sturm, J.E. y Beekhuis, G. (1999), “The weak government thesis: New evidence”, Public Choice, 101(3-4): 163-176.
• De Mello, L.R. (2001), “Fiscal Decentralization and Borrowing Costs: the Case of Local Governments”, Public Finance Review, 29 (2): 108-138.
• Derksen, W. y Korsten, A.F.A. (1995), “Policy making”, en Kickert, J.M. y Van Vught, F.A. (editores), Public Policy and Administration Sciences in the Netherlands, Ed. Prentice Hall, London.
• Derksen, W. (2001), “Lokale partijen, een andere politiek. Een onderzoek naar de lokale partijen bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 1998”, en Yearbook of the Documentation center for Dutch political parties (DNPP): 117-41 (http://www.rug.nl/dnpp/jaarboeken/jaarboek2001/derksen.pdf).
• Dickson, V. y Yu, W. (1997), “Spending by Canadian Provincial Governments: an Empirical Analysis”, Public Finance, 52 (2): 145-160.
• Easterly, W. y Rebelo, S. (1993), “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32: 417-58.
• Edin, P. y Ohlsson, H. (1991), “Political determinants of budget deficits: Coalition effects versus minority effects”, European Economic Review, 35(8): 1597-603.
• Erikson, R., Wright, G., y McIver, J. (1993), Statehouse Democracy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Escudero, P. (2002), Endeudamiento, descentralización de servicios y ciclos políticos presupuestarios: el caso de los ayuntamientos catalanes, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
• Fabricant, S. (1952), The trend of government activity in the United States since 1900, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
• Farnham, P.G. (1985), “Re-examining Local Debt Limits: A Disaggregated Analysis”, Southern Economic Journal, 51 (4): 1186-1201.
• Galli, E. y Rossi, S. (2002), “Political budget cycles: the case of the western german lander”, Public Choice, 110(3-4): 283-303.
• Grilli, V.; Masciandaro, D. y Tabellini, G. (1991), “Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries”, Economic Policy, 6(13): 341-92.
• Groves, S.M., Godsey, W.M. y Shulman, M.A. (1981), “Financial Indicators for Local Governments”, Public Budgeting and Finance, 1 (2): 5-19.
• Hagen, T.P. y Vabo, S.I. (2005), “Political characteristics, institutional procedures and fiscal performance: Panel data analyses of Norwegian local governments, 1991–1998”, European Journal of Political Research, 44: 43-64.
• Hempel, G.H. (1973), “Quantitative Borrower Characteristics Associated with Defaults on Municipal General Obligation.”, Journal of Finance, 28(2): 523-30.
• Hibbs, D.A. Jr. (1987), The political economy of industrial democracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Holsey, C.M. y Borcherding, T.E. (1997), “Why does government’s share of national income grow? An assessment of the recent literature on the U.S. experience”, en Perspectives on public choice: a handbook, Cambridge University Press: 562-90.
• Holtz-Eakin, D. (2001), “Bond Market Conditions and State-Local Capital Spending”, National Tax Journal, 44 (4): 105-20.
• Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. y Rosen, H. (1989), “The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus. Evidence from Local Government Data”, International Economic Review, 30(2): 415-29.
• Honadle, B.W. y Lloyd-Jones, M. (1998), “Analyzing Rural Local Governments’ Financial Condition: An Exploratory Application of Three Tools”, Public Budgeting and Finance, 18 (2): 69-86.
• Hsiao, C. (1986), Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hulten, C.R., y Peterson, G.E. (1984), “Is the United States Underinvesting in Public Capital? The Public Capital Stock: Needs, Trends and Performance”, American Economic Review, 74 (2): 166-73.
• Imbeau, L. M.; Pétry, F. y Lamari, M. (2001), “Left-right party ideology and government policies: A metaanalysis”, European Journal of Political Research, 40: 1–29.
• Kenny, L.W. y Winer, S.L. (2006), “Tax Systems in the World: An Empirical Investigation into the Importance of Tax Bases, Administration Costs, Scale and Political Regime”, International Tax and Public Finance, 13 (2-3), 181–215.
• Kiewiet, R. y Szalaky, K. (1996), “Constitutional limitations on borrowing: An analysis of state bonded indebtedness”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12 (1): 62-97.
• Knutsen, O. (1998), “The strength of the partisan component of left-right identity”, Party Politics, 4(1): 5-31.
• McEachern, W.A. (1978), “Collective Decision Rules and Local Debt Choice: A Test of the Median-Voter Hypothesis”, National Tax Journal, 31 (2): 129-36.
• Mercer, T., y Gilbert, M. (1996), “A Financial Condition Index for Nova Scotia Municipalities”, Government Finance Review, 12 (5): 36-8.
• Mitchell, W.E. (1967), “The Effectiveness of Debt Limit on State and Local Government Borrowing”, The Bulletin, nº 45, New York University, Institute of Finance.
• Moisio, A. (2001), “On local government spending and taxation behaviour-effect of population size and economic condition”, European Regional Science Association 41st European Congress, Zagreb (Croatia), September 2001.
• Pennings, P. (1995), “The impact of parties and unions on welfare statism”, West European Politics, 18(4): 1-17.
• Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2001), “An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt”, The Journal of Political Economy, 109(3): 570-83.
• Pogue, T.F. (1970), “The Effect of Debt Limits: Some New Evidence”, National Tax Journal, XXIII (1): 36-49.
• Pommerehne, W.W. (1978), “Institutional approaches to public expenditure. Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities”, Journal of Public Economics, 9 (2): 255-80.
• Rattsø, J. y Tovmo, P. (2002), “Fiscal Discipline and Asymmetric Adjustment of Revenues and Expenditures: Local Government Responses to Shocks in Denmark”, Public Finance Review, 30(3): 208-34.
• Reid, B. G. (1998), “Endogenous elections, electoral budget cycles and Canadian provincial government”, Public Choice, 97: 35-48.
• Rivers, M.J., y Yates, B.M. (1997), “City Size and Geographic Segmentation in the Municipal Bond Market”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37 (3): 633-45.
• Rosenberg, J. (1992), “Rationality and the Political Business Cycle: The Case of Local Government”, Public Choice, 73(1): 71-81.
• Roubini, N, y Sachs, J.D. (1989a), “Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies”, European Economic Review, 33 (5): 903-33.
• Roubini, N, y Sachs, J.D. (1989b), “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Countries”, Economic Policy, 4 (8): 99-132.
• Schmidt, M.G. (1996), “When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy”, European Journal of Political Research ,30 (2): 155-83.
• Seitz, H. (2000), “Fiscal policy, deficits and politics of subnational governments: The case of the German Laender”, Public Choice, 102: 183-218.
• Skinner, R.J. (1976), “Technological Determinism: A Critique of Convergence Theory”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 18(1): 2-27.
• Tellier, G. (2006), “Public expenditures in Canadian provinces: An empirical study of politico-economic interactions”, Public Choice, 126: 367-85
• Thomas, J.C. (1980), “Policy convergence among political parties and societies in developed nations: A Synthesis and Partial Testing of Two Theories”, Western Political Quarterly, 33 (2): 233-46.
• Tovmo, P. (2007), “Budgetary Procedures and Deficits in Norwegian Local Governments”, Economics of Governance, (8)1: 37-49.
• Tufte, E.R. (1978), Political control of the economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
• Wagner, A. (1958), “Three extracts on public finance”, en Musgrave, R. y Peacock, A. T. (editores), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Macmillan, London: 1- 16.
• Woo, J. (2003), “Economic, political, and institutional determinants of public deficits”, Journal of Public Economics, 87 (3-4): 387-426.