A multidimensional analysis of two registers of English for Navy submariners

  1. Yolanda Noguera Díaz
Language Value

ISSN: 1989-7103

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 15

Volume: 2

Pages: 81-111

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6035/LANGUAGEV.7019 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Language Value

Sustainable development goals


This research explores the differences and similarities found in two corpora representative of two registers of relevance for Navy submariners in the Spanish Navy Submarine Warfare School. It shows cases in a range of analyses based on multi-dimensional analysis that can inform professional language teaching in such contexts. It is argued that linguistic variation among the texts affords the identification of both converging and diverging patterns of variation across dimensions of use.

Bibliographic References

  • Al-Surmi, M. (2012). Authenticity and TV Shows: A Multidimensional Analysis Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (4), 671-694.
  • Anthony, L. (2019). Tools and strategies for Data-Driven Learning (DDL) in the EAP writing classroom. In Specialised English (pp. 179-194). Routledge.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (2019). Genre as interdiscursive performance in English for professional. In Specialised English (pp. 36-49). Routledge.
  • Biber, D. (1988).Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, D. (2008). Corpus-based analyses of discourse:Dimensions of variation in conversation.In K.V.Bhatia, J. Flowerdew and R. Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp.100-114). Routledge.
  • Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, D. (2019a). Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In M. Veirano Pinto and T. Berber-Sardinha (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 11-26).Bloomsbury.
  • Biber, D. (2019b). Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register studies, 1 (1), 42-75.
  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-Register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41 (2).
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English (Vol. 2). Longman.
  • Conrad, S. (2001). 4. Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 75.
  • Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2001). Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies.Routledge.
  • Ford, J., Paretti, M., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Howe, S. (2021). New engineers’ transfer of communication activities from school to work. IEEE Transactions on Profession al Communication, 64 (2), 105-120.
  • Friginal, E. (2009). The language of outsourced call centers: A corpus-based study of cross-cultural interaction. John Benjamins.
  • Friginal, E. & Roberts, J. (2020). English in Global Aviation: Context, Research, and Pedagogy. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Gray, B. (2013). More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8 (2), 153-181.
  • Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge university press.
  • Hyland, K. (2007). English for Specific Purposes. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 391-402). Springer.
  • Nini, A. (2019). The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In M. Veirano Pinto and T. Berber-Sardinha (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 67-94). Bloomsbury.
  • Ren, C., & Lu, X. (2021). A multi-dimensional analysis of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis narratives in Chinese and American corporate annual reports. English for Specific Purposes, 62.
  • Sardinha, T. B., & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.). (2019). Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues. Bloomsbury Publishing.