Exploring verbal and non-verbal expressions of ESP undergraduates’ own voices and identities.

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ajzen. I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Dorsey Press.
• Archer, A. (2010). Multimodal texts in Higher Education and the implications for writing pedagogy. English in Education, 44, 201–213.
• Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. Routledge.
• Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
• Burguess, J. & Rowsell, J. (2020). Transcultural-affective flows and multimodal engagements: Reimagining pedagogy and assessment with adult language learners. Language and Education, 34(2), 173–191.
• Canals, L. (2021). Multimodality and translanguaging in negotiation of meaning. Foreign Language Annals, 1– 24.
• Cimasko, T. & Shin, D-S. (2017). Multimodal resemiotization and authorial agency in an L2 writing classroom. Written Communication, 34(4), 387–413.
• Darvin, R. & Norton, B. (2017). Language, identity, and investment in the 21st century. In T. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education. Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 227–240). Springer.
• Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427–453. doi: 10.2307/3588070
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
• Dörnyei, Z. & Kubanyiova, M. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in Language Learning Motivation. Routledge.
• Freschi, A. & Cavalari, S. (2020). Corrective feedback and multimodality: Rethinking categories in telecollaborative learning. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 154–180.
• Grapin, S. E. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55.
• Hafner, C. A. (2015). Remix Culture and English Language Teaching: The Expression of Learner Voice in Digital Multimodal Compositions. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 486–509.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic System. Edward Arnold.
• Henry, A. (2019). Online media creation and L2 motivation: A socially situated perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2),1–33. doi: 10.1002/tesq.485
• Henry, A. (2021). Student engagement with digital video production. ELT Journal, 76(1), 109–118,
• Hood, S. & Forey, G. (2005). Introducing a conference paper: Getting interpersonal with your audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 291–306.
• Hyland, K. (2017). English in the discipline: Arguments for specificity. ESP Today, 5(1), 5–23.
• Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge.
• Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal teaching and learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 4109–4114). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Jiang, L. (2018). Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners’ writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 60–72.
• Johnson, D. & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 5–14. doi: 10.1080/09695940301697.
• Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and Speech: Two Aspects of the Process of Utterance. In Mary. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and non-verbal communication (pp. 207–227). Mouton.
• Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183–210.
• Kohnke, L. M. A., Jarvis, A. T., & Ting, W. C. A. (2021). Digital multimodal composing as authentic assessment in discipline-specific English courses: Insights from ESP learners. TESOL Journal. http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90297
• Kress, G. (2005). Gains and Losses: New Forms of Texts, Knowledge, and Learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004.
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
• Kress, G. & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265–268.
• Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ledin, P. & Machin, D. (2020). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis, 2nd ed. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Lim, F. V. & Hung. D. (2016). Teachers as learning designers. What technology has to do with learning. Educational Technology, 56(4), 26–29.
• Lim, J. & Polio, C. (2020). Multimodal assignments in higher education: Implications for multimodal writing tasks for L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47(1).
• Liu, Y. & O’Halloran, K. L. (2009) Intersemiotic texture: Analysing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19(4), 367–388.
• Loewen, S., Shaofeng, L., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Seongmee, A., & Xiaoqing, C. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
• Magnusson, P. & Godhe, A.-L. (2019). Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.12
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press.
• Mercer, S. & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
• Miller, L. (2009). Engineering lectures in a second language: What factors facilitate students’ listening comprehension? Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 8–30.
• New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 9–38). Macmillan.
• Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Pearson Education.
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. Continuum.
• O'Halloran, K. L. & Lim, F. V. (2009). Sequential Visual Discourse Frames. In E. Ventola & J. Moya (Eds.), The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues (139–156). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed., pp. 169–186). Sage.
• Ponzio, C. & Deroo, M. (2021). Harnessing multimodality in language teacher education: expanding English-dominant teachers’ translanguaging capacities through a Multimodalities Entextualization Cycle, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2021.1933893
• Potts, D. (2013). Plurilingualism as a Multimodal Practice. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 600–614.
• Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with Multimodality. Routledge. Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging Students: The Next Level of Working on the Work. Jossey-Bass.
• Selander, S. (2008). Designs for learning – a theoretical perspective. Designs for Learning, 1(1), 4– 22. Stam, G. (2008). What gestures reveal about second language acquisition. In S. McCafferty, & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second Language Acquisition and Classroom Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
• Stam, G. (2014). Why gesture! Al-Forum-The Newsletter of the Applied Linguistic Section, TESOL, September 2014.
• Stetsenko, A. (2019). Radical-transformative agency: continuities and contrasts with relational agency and implications for education. Frontiers in Education, 4. DOI:10.3389/feduc.2019.00148
• Tardy, C. M. (2005). Expressions of disciplinarity and individuality in a multimodal genre. Computers and Composition, 22(3), 319–336. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2005.05.004.
• Unsworth, L. & Cleirigh, C. (2009). Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image-text interaction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 151–163). Routledge.
• Ushioda, E. (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners (pp. 19–34). Cambridge University Press.
• Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity, and the L2 Self (pp. 215– 28). Multilingual Matters.
• van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. Longman.
• van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford University Press.
• van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy, and identity. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 46–65. doi: 10.2167/illt42.0.
• Walsh, M. (2015). Literacy education. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn., (pp. 246–250). Elsevier.
• Zhao, S., Djonov, E. & van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text & Talk, 34(3), 349–375.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.