Autonomic modulation duringa cognitive task using a wearable device

  1. Maria Paula Bonomini 1
  2. Mikel Val-Calvo 2
  3. Alejandro Díaz-Morcillo 3
  4. José Manuel Ferrández Vicente 3
  5. Eduardo Fernández-Jover 4
  1. 1 Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  3. 3 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

  4. 4 Univ. Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
Libro:
Understanding the Brain Function and Emotions: 8th International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, IWINAC 2019 Almería, Spain, June 3–7, 2019 Proceedings, Part I
  1. José Manuel Ferrández Vicente (dir. congr.)
  2. José Ramón Álvarez-Sánchez (dir. congr.)
  3. Félix de la Paz López (dir. congr.)
  4. Javier Toledo Moreo (dir. congr.)
  5. Hojjat Adeli (dir. congr.)

Editorial: Springer Suiza

ISBN: 978-3-030-19591-5

Año de publicación: 2019

Páginas: 69-77

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

Resumen

Heart-brain interaction is by nature bidirectional, and then,it is sensible to expect the heart, via the autonomic nervous system(ANS), to induce changes in the brain. Respiration can originate differentiated ANS states reflected by HRV.In this work, we measured the changes in performance during a cognitive task due to four autonomic states originated by breath control: at normal breathing (NB),fast breathing (FB), slow breathing (SB) and control phases. ANS states were characterized by temporal (SDNN) and spectral (LF and HF power) HRV markers. Cognitive performance was measured by the response time (RT) and the success rate (SR). HRV parameters were acquired with the wristband Empatica E4. Classification was accomplished, firstly, to find the best ANS variables that discriminated the breathing phases (BPH) and secondly, to find whether ANS parameters were associated to changes in RT and SR. In order to compensate for possible bias of the test sets, 1000 classification iterations were run. The ANS parameters that better separated the four BPH were LF and HF power, with changes about 300% from controls and an average classification rate of 59.9%, a 34.9% more than random. LF and HF explained RT separation for every BPH pair, and so was HF for SR separation. The best RT classification was 63.88% at NB vs SB phases, while SR provided a 73.39% at SB vs NB phases. Results suggest that breath control could show a relation with the efficiency of certain cognitive tasks. For this goal the Empatica wristband together with the proposed methodology could help to clarify thishypothesis.