Spurious Rejections by Dickey-Fuller Tests in the Presence of an Endogenously Determined Break under the Null

  1. Badillo Amador, Rosa
  2. Belaire Franch, Jorge
  3. Reverte Maya, Carmelo
Journal:
Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

ISSN: 1886-516X

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 9

Pages: 3-16

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

Abstract

Leybourne et al. (1998) have proved the possibility of a converse Perron phenomenon' when conventional Dickey-Fuller tests are applied to determine the order of integration of a time series. That is, if the true generating process is I(1) but with a break, frequent spurious rejections of the null hypothesis can occur. Although Leybourne et al. (1998) suggest it would be appropriate to use procedures in which the break date was treated as endogenous, they consider it as exogenous. Thus, this paper analyses whether their results change when the structural break is identi¯ed endogenously, that is, if the break point is gleaned from the data. In this sense, applying a recursive tDF test to a unit root process which has a break in its level, there is no virtually evidence of the `converse Perron phenomenon'. For the rest of the endogeneization procedures (i.e., rolling and sequential) and for the two types of breaks considered (in level or in drift), we ¯nd, in line with Leybourne et al. (1998), some distortion in the Dickey-Fuller tDF test size, which depends on the break size, the location of the break point in the sample and the sample size.

Bibliographic References

  • Banerjee, A., Lumsdaine, R.L. and Stock, J.H. (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit-root and trend-break hypotheses: Theory and international evidence, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 271-87.
  • Christiano, L. J. (1992) Searching for a break in GNP, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 237-250.
  • Dickey, D. and Fuller, W. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American Satistical Association, 74, 427-431.
  • Fuller, W. A. (1976) Introduction to statistical time series. New York, Willey.
  • Granger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. (1974) Spurious regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
  • Leybourne, S., Mills, T. and Newbold, P. (1998) Spurious rejections by DF tests in the presence of a break under the null, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 191-203.
  • Nelson, C.R. and Plosser C.I. (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Some evidence and implications, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139-162.
  • Perron, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
  • Perron, P. (1994) Trend, unit root and structural change in macroeconomic time series. In Rao, B. B. (ed), Cointegration for the Applied Economists. MacMillan, New York, NY, 113-146.
  • Perron, P. (1997) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables, Journal of Econometrics, 80, 355-385.
  • Perron, P., Vogelsang, T. J., (1992) Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 301-320.
  • Vogelsang, T. J., Perron, P. (1998) Additional tests for a unit root allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time, International Economic Review 39(4), 1073-1100.
  • Yule, G.U. (1926) Why do we sometimes get nonsense correlations between time series? A study in sampling and the nature of time series, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 89, 1-64.
  • Zivot, E., Andrews, D.W.K., (1992) Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 251-270.