Discussion on Bias, accuracy and explainability of the Ohlson (1995) valuation model vs. the traditional dividend, free cash flow and abnormal earnings modelsevidence from spanish firms

  1. Íñiguez Sánchez, Raúl
  2. Reverte Maya, Carmelo
  3. Amor Tapia, Borja comp.
Journal:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Year of publication: 2012

Issue: 156

Pages: 615-622

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Bibliographic References

  • BAGINSKI, S. P., and WAHLEN, J. M. 2003. Residual Income Risk, Intrinsic Values, and Share Prices, Accounting Review 78 (1): 327-351.
  • BLACK, F. 1986. Noise, Journal of Finance 41 (3): 529-543.
  • CARHART, M. 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance 52 (1): 57-82.
  • COUHTEAU, L.; KAO, J. L., and RICHARDSON, G. D. 2001. Equity Valuation Employing the Ideal versus Ad Hoc Terminal Value Expressions. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (4): 625-661.
  • DAMODARAN, A. 2006. Damodaran on Valuation: Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance. Wiley. 2. ed.
  • DECHOW, P.; HUTTON, A., and SLOAN, R. 1999. An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1-3): 1-34.
  • FAMA, E. F. 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383-417.
  • Fama, E.F. 1998. Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance. Journal of Financial Economics 49 (3): 283-306.
  • FAMA, E. F., and FRENCH, K. R. 1993. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1): 3-56.
  • FERNÁNDEZ, P. 2002. Three Residual Income Valuation Methods and Discounted Cash Flow Valuation. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.coin/ abstracU296945
  • - 2005. Valoración de Empresas. Gestión 2000. 3ed.
  • FRANCIS, J.; OLSSON, P., and OSWALD, D. R. 2000. Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings Equity Value Estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (1): 45-70.
  • FRANKEL, R. M., and LEE, C. M. C. 1998. Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (3): 283-319.
  • HESS, D.; HOMBURG, C; LORENZ, M., and SIEVERS, S. 2009. Extended Dividend, Cash Flow and Residual Income Valuation Models-Accounting for Deviations from Ideal Conditions. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstrac= 1145201
  • IÑIGUEZ, R., and REVERTE, C 2011. Bias, Accuracy and Explainability of the Ohlson (1995) Valuation Model Vs the Traditional Dividend, Free Cash Flow and Abnormal Earnings Models: Evidence from Spanish Firms. Revista Española de Fmanciación y Contabilidad, 153:89-118.
  • JORGENSEN, B. N.; LEE, Y. G., and Yoo, Y. K. 2011. The Valuation Accuracy of Equity Value Estimates Inferred from Conventional Empirical Implementations of the Abnormal Earnings Growth Model: US Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38 (3-4): 446-471.
  • KAPLAN, S., and RUBACK, R. 1995. The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance 50 (4): 1059-1093.
  • KOLLER, T.; GOEDHART, M., and WESSELS, W. 2005. Valuation. John Wiley & Sons. 4 ed.
  • LEE, C. M. C; MYERS, J., and SWAMINATHAN, B. 1999. What Is the Intrinsic Value of the Dow? Journal of Finance 54 (5): 1693-1741.
  • LUNDHOLM, R., and O'KEEFE, T. 2001. Reconciling Value Estimates from the Discounted Cash Flow Model and the Residual Income Model. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (2): 311-335.
  • OHLSON, J. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 661-688.
  • PALEPU, K.; HEALY, P., and BERNARD, V. 2000. Business analysis and valuation: Using financial statements. South-Western Thomson Learning.
  • PENMAN, S. H. 1998.A Synthesis of Equity Valuation Techniques and the Terminal Value Calculation for the Dividend Discount Model. Review of Accounting Studies 2 (4): 303-323.
  • - 2001. On Comparing Cash Flow and Accrual Accounting Models for Use in Equity Valuation: A Response to Lundholm and O'Keefe. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (4): 681-692.
  • PENMAN, S. H., and SOUGIANNIS, T. 1998. A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (3): 343-383.
  • RICHARDSON, S.; TUNA, I., and WYSOCKI, P. 2010. Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3): 410-454.
  • VELEZ-PAREJA, I., and THAM, J. 2003. Do the RIM (Residual Income Model), EVA(R) and DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) Really Match?. Working Paper No. 25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=379740