La importancia de las diferencias institucionales entre países en el nivel de consecución de los ODSun estudio empírico a escala mundial

  1. Carmelo Reverte Maya 1
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

Revista:
Revista de fomento social

ISSN: 0015-6043 2695-6462

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 299

Páginas: 115-159

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.32418/RFS.2021.299.4583 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de fomento social

Resumen

Utilizando como soporte teórico los modelos de Matten y Moon (2008) y de la “quíntuple hélice”, la presente investigación analiza si las diferencias a nivel mundial entre 64 países en el nivel de consecución de los ODS pueden ser explicadas por una serie de variables institucionales relacionadas con las siguientes cinco dimensiones: el sistema cultural, el sistema político–legal, el desarrollo económico, el sistema educativo–laboral y la innovación. Nuestros resultados ponen de relieve el crucial rol de las políticas públicas en el nivel de consecución de los ODS mediante la mejora de la calidad institucional y de los sistemas de gobernanza así como a través de la promoción del gasto educativo y del ecosistema de innovación. En este sentido, resulta muy apropiada la adopción del modelo de la “quíntuple hélice” mediante la interrelación entre el gobierno, la Universidad y la empresa para afrontar los desafíos sociales y medioambientales que suponen los ODS.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADAMS, C. A. (2002). “Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.
  • ALI, W., FRYNAS, J. G., & MAHMOOD, Z. (2017). “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24, 273–294.
  • BANSAL, P. (2005). “Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development”. Strategic Management Journal 26, 197–218.
  • BAUGHN, C. C., BODIE, N. L., & MCINTOSH, J. C. (2007). “Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions”. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 14, 189–205.
  • BERNAUER, T., & KOUBI, V. (2013). “Are Bigger Governments Better Providers of Public Goods? Evidence from Air Pollution”. Public Choice, 156(3), 593–609.
  • BIERMANN, F., KANIE, N., & KIM, R. E. (2017). “Global governance by goal–setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26– 27, 26–31.
  • BUHR, N., & FREEDMAN, M. (2001). “Culture, Institutional Factors and Differences in Environmental Disclosure Between Canada and the United States”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12, 293– 322.
  • CALABRESE, A., COSTA, R., & ROSATI, F. (2016). “Gender differences in customer expectations and perceptions of corporate social responsibility”. Journal of Cleaner Production 116, 135–149.
  • CAMPBELL, J. L. (2007). “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility”. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2007), 946–967.
  • CAPRAR, D. V., & NEVILLE, B. A. (2012). “’Norming’ and ‘Conforming’: Integrating Cultural and Institutional Explanations for Sustainability Adoption in Business”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 110 (2), 231–245.
  • CARAYANNIS, E. G., & CAMPBELL D. F. J. (2009). “‘Mode 3’ and ’Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem”. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4):201–234
  • CARAYANNIS, E. G., THORSTEN, D. B., & CAMPBELL, D. F. (2012). “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation”. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–12.
  • CHEN, S., & BOUVAIN, P. (2009). “Is corporate responsibility converging? a comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany”. Journal of Business Ethics 87, 299–317.
  • CIOCIRLAN, C., & PETTERSON, C. (2012). “Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies”, Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 19(1), 47–62.
  • CLAESSENS, S., & J.P. H. FAN. (2002). “Corporate governance in Asia: A survey”. International Review of Finance 3: 71–103.
  • COLUCCIA, D., FONTANA, S., & SOLIMENE, S. (2018). “Does Institutional Context Affect CSR Disclosure? A Study on Eurostoxx 50”. Sustainability, 10, 2823.
  • COOKE, T. E., & WALLACE, R. S. O. (1990). “Financial disclosure regulation and its environment” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 9, Nº 2, 79 –110.
  • DEEGAN, C. (2002). “Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311
  • DE GEER, H., BORGLUND, T., & FROSTENSON, M. (2009). “Reconciling CSR with the role of the corporation in welfare states – the problematic Swedish example”, Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (3), 269–283
  • DE MOOIJ, M., & HOFSTEDE, G. (2010). “The Hofstede model: Applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research”. International Journal of Advertising: The Quarterly Review of Marketing Communications, 29(1), 85–110.
  • DE VILLIERS, C., & MARQUES, A. (2016). “Corporate social responsibility country–level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosures”. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 167–195.
  • DELLAPORTAS, S. (2006). “Making a difference with a discrete course on accounting ethics”. Journal of Business Ethics 65, 391–404.
  • DELMAS, M. A., & TOFFEL, M. W. (2008). “Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box”. Strategic Management Journal 29, 1027–1055.
  • DIMAGGIO, P. J., & POWELL, W. W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
  • — (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • DURACH, C., & WIENGARTEN, F. (2017). “Environmental management: The impact of national and organisational long–term orientation on plants’ environmental practices and performance efficacy”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167 (20), 749–758.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H, & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations”. Research Policy, 29: 109–123.
  • ELIAS, R. Z. (2004). “An Examination of Business Students’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibilities Before and After Bankruptcies”. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 267–281.
  • FASAN, M., MARCON, C., & MIO, C. (2016). “Institutional Determinants of IR Disclosure Quality”, in: MIO, C. (Ed.), Integrated Reporting: A New Accounting Disclosure, 181–203.
  • FERNÁNDEZ–FEIJOO, B., ROMERA, S., & RUIZ, S. (2012). “Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting?”. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3, 31–39.
  • FORTANIER, F., KOLK, A., & PINKSE, J. (2011). “Harmonization in CSR Reporting: MNEs and Global CSR Standards”. Management International Review 51, 665–696.
  • FRANCIS, J. R., KHURANA, I. K., MARTIN, X., & PEREIRA, R. (2011). “The Relative Importance of Firm Incentives versus Country Factors in the Demand for Assurance Services by Private Entities”, Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 28(2), 487–516.
  • FREDRIKSSON, P. G., NEUMAYER, E., & UJHELYI, G. (2007). “Kyoto Protocol Cooperation: Does Government Corruption Facilitate Environmental Lobbying?”. Public Choice, 133(1), 231–251.
  • FREEMAN, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
  • GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, I. M., RODRÍGUEZ ARIZA, L., & FRÍAS ACEITUNO, J. V. (2013). “The cultural system and integrated reporting”. International Business Review 22, 828–838.
  • GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, I. M., CUADRADO BALLESTEROS, B., & FRIAS ACEITUNO, J. V. (2016). “Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information”. Long Range Planning, 49 (1), 15–35.
  • GRAAFLAND, J., & NOORDERHAVEN, N. (2020). “Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long–term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility”, Journal of International Business Studies, en prensa.
  • GRAY, R., KOUHY, R., & LAVERS, S. (1995). “Corporate social and environmental reporting. A review of the literature and longitudinal study of UK disclosure”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
  • GUTHRIE, J., & PARKER, L. D. (1990). “Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis”. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.
  • HALKOS, G., & SKOULOUDIS, A. (2016). “National CSR and institutional conditions: An exploratory study”. Journal of Cleaner Production 139, 1150–1156.
  • — (2017). “Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility and national culture: A quantitative assessment”. Management Decision 55, 595–613.
  • — (2018). “Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro–level perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production.
  • HAHN, R., & KÜHNEN, M. (2013). “Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
  • HOFSTEDE, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications, London (UK).
  • HOFSTEDE, G., HOFSTEDE, G. J., & MINKOV, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw–Hill.
  • HUSTED, B. (2005). “Culture and ecology: A cross–national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability”. Management International Review 45, 349–371.
  • JACKSON, G., & APOSTOLAKOU, A. (2010). “Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute?”. Journal of Business Ethics 94, 371–394.
  • JENSEN, J. C., & BERG, N. (2012). “Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach”. Business Strategy and the Environment 21, 299–316.
  • JO, H., SONG, M. H., & TSANG, A. (2015). “Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder governance around the world”. Global Finance Journal, 29, 42–69
  • KAUFMANN, D., KRAAY, A., & MASTRUZZI, M. (2011). “The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues”. Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
  • KATZ, J. P., SWANSON, D. L., & NELSON, L. K. (2001). “Culture–Based Expectations of Corporate Citizenship: a Propositional Framework and Comparison of Four Cultures”. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9, 149–171.
  • KEIG, D. L., BROUTHERS, L. E., & MARSHALL, V. B. (2015). “Formal and informal corruption environments and multinational enterprise social irresponsibility”. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), 89–116.
  • KNUDSEN, J. S. (2011). “Company delisting from the UN Global Compact: Limited business demand or domestic governance failure?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 331–349.
  • KUMAR, S., GIRIDHAR, V., & SADARANGANI, P. (2019). “A Cross–national Study of Environmental Performance and Culture: Implications of the Findings and Strategies”, Global Business Review 20 (4), 1051–1068
  • LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ DE SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1998). “Law and Finance”. Journal of Political Economy 106, 11131–55.
  • LINDBLOM, C. (1994). “The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
  • LUNDVALL, B.A. (Ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
  • LUTHAR, H. K., DIBATTISTA, R. A., & GAUTSCHI, T. (1997). “Perception of what the Ethical Climate is and what it should be: the Role of Gender, Academic Status, and Ethical Education”. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 205–217.
  • MATHUR, K., & BERWA, A. (2017). “Sustainable competitiveness: redefining the future with technology and innovation”. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 7, 290–306.
  • MATTEN, D., & MOON, J. (2008). “‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility”. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
  • MCWILLIAMS, A., & SIEGEL, D. (2001). “Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective”. Academy of management review 26 (1), 117–127.
  • MEYER, J. W., & ROWAN, B. (1977). “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.
  • MISKA, C., SZÖCS, I., & SCHIFFINGER, M. (2018). “Culture’s effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi–domain and multi–level view”. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 263–279.
  • NORTH, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge UniversityPress.
  • NWABUZOR, A. (2005). “Corruption and Development: New Initiatives in Economic Openness and Strengthened Rule of Law”. Journal of Business Ethics 59, 121–138.
  • ORIJ, R. (2010). “Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23, 868–889.
  • PACTO MUNDIAL DE NACIONES UNIDAS (2018a). Global goals for people and planet.
  • — (2018b). How Your Company Can Advance Each of the SDGs.
  • — (2018c). Reporting on the SDGs – Shape the future of corporate reporting on the SDGs.
  • PAHL–WOSTL, C., TÀBARA, D., BOUWEN, R., CRAPS, M., DEWULF, A., MOSTERT, E., RIDDER, & D., TAILLIEU, T. (2008). “The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management”. Ecological Economics 64, 484–495.
  • PARBOTEEAH, K. P., ADDAE, H. M., & CULLEN, J. B. (2012). “Propensity to Support Sustainability Initiatives: A Cross–National Model”. Journal of Business Ethics, 105: 403–413.
  • PARK, H., RUSSELL, C., & LEE, J. (2007). “National Culture and Environmental Sustainability: a Cross–National Analysis”. Journal of Economics and Finance 31, 104–121.
  • PENG, Y. S., DASHDELEG, A. U., & CHIH, H. L. (2014). “National culture and firm’s CSR engagement: A cross–nation study”. Journal of Marketing and Management, 5(1), 38–49
  • PRADO LORENZO, J., RODRÍGUEZ DOMÍNGUEZ, L., GALLEGO ÁLVAREZ, I., & GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, I. M. (2009). “Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world–wide”. Management Decision 47, 1133–1157.
  • PRADO LORENZO, J. M., GARCÍA, M. y BLÁZQUEZ, A. (2013). “El impacto del sistema cultural en la transparencia corporativa”. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 22, 143–154.
  • QUAZI, A. M. (2003). “Identifying the determinants of corporate managers’ perceived social obligations”. Management Decision 41, 822–831.
  • RINGOV, D., & ZOLLO, M. (2007). “Corporate responsibility from a socio–institutional perspective: The impact of national culture on corporate social performance”. Corporate Governance 7, 476–485.
  • ROSATI, F., COSTA, R., CALABRESE, A., & PEDERSEN, E. R. G. (2018). “Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
  • ROY, A. y GOLL, I. (2014). “Predictors of various facets of sustainability of nations: The role of cultural and economic factors”. International Business Review 23, 849–861.
  • SACHS, J., SCHMIDT–TRAUB, G., KROLL, C., LAFORTUNE, G. y FULLER, G. (2019). Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions.
  • SCOTT, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • — (2007). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.
  • SUCHMAN, M. C. (1995). “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches”. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.
  • SZ CS, I., SCHLEGELMILCH, B. B., RUSCH, T., & SHAMMA, H. M. (2016). “Linking cause assessment, corporate philanthropy, and corporate reputation”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 376–396.
  • VACHON, S. (2010). “International Operations and Sustainable Development: Should National Culture Matter?”. Sustainable Development 18, 350–361.
  • VORMEDAL, I. H. y RUUD, A. (2009). “Sustainability reporting in Norway – An assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio–political drivers”. Business Strategy and the Environment 18, 207–222.
  • VU, T. V. (2020). Individualism and climate change policies: International evidence, MPRA Paper 98888.
  • WELFORD, R. (2005). “Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 33–52
  • WILLIAMS, G., & ZINKIN, J. (2008). “The effect of culture on consumers’ willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: Applying Hofstede’s typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility”. Business Ethics: A European Review 17, 210–226.
  • WILLIAMS, S. M. (1999). “Voluntary Environmental and Social Accounting Disclosure Practices in the Asia–Pacific Region: An International Empirical Test of Political Economy Theory”. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(2), 209–238.
  • YAVEROGLU, I. S., & DONTHU, N. (2002). “Cultural influences on the diffusion of products”. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 14, Nº 4, 49–63.
  • ZHOU, S., SIMNETT, R., & GREEN, W. (2013). The effect of legal environment and corporate governance on the decision to assure and assurance provider choice: Evidence from the GHG assurance market. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper.
  • ZUCKER, L. G. (1987). “Institutional theories of organization”. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.