La calidad en la traducción por medio de herramientas TAO y CohLitheSP

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adhikary, Ramesh Prasad. “Degrees of equivalence in translation – a case study of nepali novel ‘seto bagh’ into english as ‘the wake of the white tiger”. In European Journal of Multilingualism and Translation Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, May 2020, 16. https://oapub.org/lit/index.php/EJMTS/article/view/173. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Ahrenberg, Lars. “Comparing machine translation and human translation: A case study”. In Irina Temnikova, Constantin Orasan, Gloria Corpas and Stephan Vogel (eds), RANLP 2017 The First Workshop on Human-Informed Translation and Interpreting Technology (HiT-IT) Proceedings of the Workshop, September 7th, 2017; 2017, pp. 21-28.
• Basil, Hatim. and Mason, Iam. Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman, 1990.
• Beltrán, Rocío. “Vino, publicidad y traducción”. Puentes: hacia nuevas investigaciones en la mediación intercultural. No. 1, 2002, pp. 57-67.
• Besacier, Laurent., and Schwartz, Lane. “Automated translation of a literary work : a pilot study,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (Denver, CO), 2015, pp. 114–122.
• Bowker, Lynne. and Fisher, Desmond. “Computer-aided translation.” Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer (eds). Handbook of Translation Studies. 2010. Volume 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010, pp. 60–65.
• Carroll, John. “Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology as a Science of Design.” Annual Review of Psychology. 1997. 48, pp. 61–83.
• ---. “Human Computer Interaction – brief intro.” Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam (eds). The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.Aarhus: The Interaction Design Foundation. 2013. www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/human_computer_interaction_hci.html. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Catford, John Cunnison. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.
• Christensen, Tina Paulsen. “Studies on the Mental Processes in Translation Memory-assisted Translation – the State of the Art.” transkom. 2011. 4(2), pp. 137-160.
• Christensen, Tina Paulsen. and Schjoldager, Anne. “Computer-aided translation as a distributed cognitive task.” Pragmatics & Cognition. 2016.14(2), 443–464.
• Dartmoor National Park Authority. “Historic Landscapes”. Welcome to Dartmoor National Park. 2017. https://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/wildlife-and-heritage/landscape/historic-landscapes. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Delisle, Jean. L’analyse du discourse comme méthode de traduction: Initiation à la traduction française de textes pragmatiques anglais, Thèorie et practique. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1980.
• Dragsted, Barbara. “Computer-aided translation as a distributed cognitive task.” Pragmatics & Cognition.2006.14(2), pp. 443–464.
• Durán Muñoz, Isabel. “El español y su dimensión mediadora en el ámbito turístico“. Actas del IV Congreso Internacional El Español, lengua de traducción para la cooperación y el diálogo., Toledo, 7-11 May 2008.
• ---.“Necesidades de mejora y adecuación en la traducción de textos turísticos promocionales“. Hermeneus, 2012a, pp. 2-3.
• Essentially England News. “English Food Traditional Lunches and Dinners“. Essentially England For England Lovers Everywhere. 2015.
• www.essentially-england.com/english-food-lunch-and-dinner.html. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Federico, Marcello, Cattelan, Alessandro. and Trombetti, Marco. “Measuring user productivity in machine translation enhanced computer assisted translation.” Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA). 2012.
• Fernández Huerta, José. “Medidas sencillas de lecturabilidad“. Consigna 1959; (214): 29-32.
• Fiederer, Rebecca., and O’Brien, Sharon. “Quality and Machine Translation: A Realistic Objective? “ The Journal of Specialised Translation, 2009, 11, pp. 52-74.
• Flesch, Rudolf. “A new readability yardstick“. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948, 32(3), pp. 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Folaron, Deborah. “Translation tools.” Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer (eds). Handbook of Translation Studies, Volume 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2010, pp. 429–436.
• Fuentes Luque, Adrián. (ed.). "Universidad de Granada Digibug." La traducción en el sector turístico. Granada: Atrio, 2005. 59-92. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/32331. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Garcia, Ignacio. “Translating by post-editing: is it the way forward?” Machine Translation. 2011. 25, pp. 217–237.
• Giammarresi, Salvatore and Lapalme, Guy. “Computer science and translation: Natural languages and machine translation“. In Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, editors, Border Crossings: Translation Studies and other disciplines, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2016, chapter 8, pp. 205–224.
• Graesser, Arthur, Tackett, Andrew, MacNamara, Danielle., McCarthy, Philip and Cai, Zhiquiang. (dir.) “Coh-Metrix.”. Documentation Web Tool Contact. 16 August 2017. http://cohmetrix.com/. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Graesser, Arthur, McNamara, Danielle, and Louwerse, Max. What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. 2003, pp. 82–98. New York: Guilford.
• Graham, Yvette, Baldwin, Timothy, Moffat, Alistair and Zobel, Justin. “Continuous Measurement Scales in Human Evaluation of Machine Translation“. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Anno tation Workshop & Interoperability with Discourse, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2013, pp. 33–41.
• Gregory, Shreve and Angelone, Erik. ‘Uncertainty Management, Metacognitive Bundling in Problem Solving, and Translation Quality’, in Sharon O’Brien (ed.) Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum, 2011, pp. 108–30.
• Guerberof Arenas, Ana. “Productivity and quality in the post-editing of outputs from translation memories and machine translation.” Localisation Focus. 2009. 7(1), pp. 11–21.
• ---. Productivity and quality in the post-editing of outputs from translation memories and machine translation. PhD thesis. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. 2012. www.researchgate.net/publication/320467106_Productivity_and_quality_in_MT_post-editing.
• ---. “The Role of Professional Experience in Post-Editing from a Quality and Productivity Perspective.” Sharon O’Brien, Laura Winther Balling, Michael Carl, Michel Simard and Lucia Specia (eds). 2014a. Post-Editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 51–76.
• ---. “Correlations between productivity and quality when post-editing in a professional context.” Machine Translation. 2014b. 28(3-4), pp. 165–186.
• Hansen, Gyde. “Success in Translation”, in: Perspectives: Studies in Translatology. vol. 5, no 2., 1997, pp. 201-210.
• Hassan, Hany, Aue, Anthony, Chen, Chang, Chowdhary, Vishal, Clark, Jonathan, Federmann, Christina , Huang, Xuedong, Junczys-Dowmunt, Marcin, Lewis, William, Li, Mu, Liu, S., Liu, Shujie, Lio, Tie-Yan, Menezes, Arul, Qin, Tao, Seide, Frank, Tan, Xu, Tian, Fei, Wu, Lijun, Wu, Shuangzhi, Xia, Yingce, Zhang, Dongdong, Zhang, Zhirui, and Zhou, Ming. “Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translation”. Computing Research Repository, 2018. arXiv:1803.05567. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Hatim, Basil and Mason, Iam. Discourse and the Translator, London: Longman . 1990.
• House, Juliane. (2d ed.). A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Narr. 1981.
• ---. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr 1997.
• ---. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and present. Routledge. 2015.
• ---.“Translation: The Basics”. Babel, Volume 64, Issue 3, Dec 2018, pp. 490 – 494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00047.kan. 2018. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Hurtado Albir, Amparo. Traducción y Traductología: Introducción a la Traductología. Madrid: Cátedra. 2001.
• Jakobson, Roman. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation”, in Reuben Brower (ed.) On Translation. New York: Oxford University Press. 1996.
• Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel Ángel. “Conventions in localisation: a corpus study of original vs. translated web texts”. JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation, 2009, 12, pp. 79–102.
• Kirti, Vashee. A closer look at sdl’s adaptive mt technology. 2017. Http://kv- emptypages.blogspot.se/2017/01/a-closer-look- at-sdls-adaptive-mt.html. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Kishore Papineni, Roukos, Salim, Ward, Todd and Zhu, Wei-Ying. “Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation”. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2002, pp. 311–318. https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Koller, Werner. “The Concept of Equivalence and the Object of Translation Studies“, Target 7. 1995, pp. 191–222.
• Koller, Werner. (11th ed.) Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Tübingen: Francke. 2011.
• Lapshinova-Koltunski, Ekaterina. “VARTRA: A comparable corpus for analysis of translation variation“. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Building and Using Comparable Corpora, 2013, pp. 77–86. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-2510/. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Läubli, Samuel, Senrich, Rico and Volk, Martin. Cornell University Computer Science > Computation and Language. arXiv:1808.07048 [cs.C]. 2018. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Martinez Mateo, Roberto. “A deeper look into metrics for translation quality assessment (TQA): A case study“. Miscelanea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 2014, 49, pp. 73–94.
• Martıinez Mateo, Roberto, Montero Martínez, Silvia and Moya Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús. “The modular assessment pack: a new approach to translation quality assessment at the directorate general for translation“. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 2017, 25, pp. 18–48. Doi 10.1080/0907676X.2016.1167923. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Massey, Gary and Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen. “Evaluating translation processes: Opportunities and challenges“. In book: New Prospects and Perspectives for Educating Language Mediators. Publisher: Gunther Narr. Editors: Don Kiraly, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Karin Maksymski. 2013.
• Matecat https://site.matecat.com/benefits/?gclid=Cj0KCQjw6uT4BRD5ARIsADwJQ1-s67PUj9ENqpo1g9Yl5kP2SQyfikdDv3DU_dHUMG-rxM2J_XsFG6QaAk0yEALw_wcB. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Maureen, Ehrensberger-Dow, Göpferich, Susanne and O’Brien, Sharon (eds) “Special Issue: Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research“. Target 25:1. 2013.
• Melby, Alan and Warner, Terry. “The Possibility of Language“. John Benjamins e-Platform. John Benjamins, London and New York. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.14. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Mona, Baker and Pérez-González, Luis. ‘Translation and Interpreting’, in James Simpson (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 39–52.
• Muñoz Martín, Ricardo. “A blurred snapshot of advances in translation process research” Ricardo Muñoz Martín (ed.) (2014). Minding Translation. Special Issue 1 of MonTI. 2014, pp. 49–84.
• Neubert, Albrecht. “Elemente einer allgemeinen Theorie der Translation, in Actes du Xe Congrès International des Linguistes, Bucharest, 1970, pp. 451–56.
• Neubert, Albrecht. Text and Translation. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie. 1985.
• Nida, Eugene. Toward a Science of Translation. Leiden: Brill. 1964.
• Nord, Christiane. Translation as a Purposeful Activity. St Jerome, Manchester, UK. 1997.
• O’Brien, S. Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum. 2011.
• O’Brien, Karen. “Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation”. Progress in Human Geography, 2012. 36(5), pp. 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• O’Brien, Sharon. (2013) ‘The Borrowers: Researching the Cognitive Aspects of Translation’, Target 25, 2013, pp. 5–17.
• O’Brien, Sharon., Balling, Laura Winther, Carl, Michael, Simard, Michel and Specia, Lucia. Post- Editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, New- castle upon Tyne. 2014.
• Papineni, Kishore, Roukos, Salim, Ward, Todd, and Zhu, Wei-Jing. “BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation”. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, July 2002, pp. 311-318. 10.3115/1073083.1073135. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Popovic, Maja ́ and Burchardt, Aljoscha. “From human to automatic error classification for machine translation output”. In Proceedings of the 15th Inter- national Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation. Leuven, Belgium, 2011, pp. 265– 272.
• Pym, Anthony. ‘European Translation Studies, une science qui dérange, and why Equivalence Needn’t Be a Dirty Word’, TTR 8: 153–76. 1995. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Pym, Anthony. “What technology does to translating.” Translation and Interpreting. 2011. 3(1), pp. 1–9.
• Real Academia Española. “Diccionario de la Lengua Española”. Traducir. https://dle.rae.es/traducir?m=form. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Reiss, Katharina and Vermeer, Hans. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 1984.
• Riccardi, Alessandra. Translation studies: Perspectives on an emerging discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010.
• Shreve, Gregory, Lacruz, Isabel, and Angelone, Erik. “Sight Translation and Speech Disfluency: Performance Analysis as a Window to Cognition.” In Investigating the Process- What it Tells Us About Translating and Interpreting, ed. by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild, and Elisabet Tiselius, 93–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2011.
• Tatsumi, Midori. “Post-Editing Machine Translated Text in A Commercial Setting: Observation and Statistical Analysis”. PhD thesis. Dublin City University. DORAS, 1 Oct. 2010, doras.dcu.ie/16062/. http://doras.dcu.ie/16062/1/SAKURA_final_revised.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• The Royal Collection Trust. “Windsor Castle”. Royal Palaces, Residences and Art Collection. 1987. https://www.rct.uk/. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Teixeira, Carlos. “Knowledge of Provenance and its Effects on Translation Performance in an Integrated TM/MT Environment.” Bernadette Sharp, Michael Zock, Michael Carl and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen (eds). 2011. Proceedings of the 8th International NLPCS Workshop: Human- Machine Interaction in Translation. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, pp. 119–130.
• Vashee, Kirti. “Understanding the Economics of Machine Translation”. Translation Spaces, 2, 125-149. 2013. DOI: 10.1075/ts.2.07vas
• Venture Xtreme Consultancy Ltd. “About Venture Xtreme”. Venture Xtreme. 2021. https://www.venture-xtreme.com/. Accessed 21 April 2021.
• Vinay, Jean-Paul and Darbelnet. Jean, Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1995.
• Wu, Yonghui, Schuster, Mike, Chen, Zhifeng, Le, Quoc, Norouzi, Mohammad, Macherey, Wofgang, Krikun, Maxim, Cao, Yuan, Gao, Qin, Macherey, Klaus, Klingner, Jeff, Shah, Apurva, Johnson, Melvin, Liu, Xiaobing, Kaiser, Łukasz, Gouws, Stephan, Kato, Yoshikiyo, Kudo, Taku, Kazawa, Hideto, Stevens, Keith, Kurian, George, Patil, Nishant, Wang, Wei, Young, Cliff, Smith, Jasson, Riesa, Jasson, Rudnick, Alex, Vinyals, Oriol, Corrado, Greg, Hughes, Macduff and Dean, Jeffrey. “Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation”. Cornell University, Computer Science > Computation and Language. 2016. CoRR abs/1609.08144. Http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144. Accessed 21 April 2021. Zong, Zhaorong. “Research on the Relations Between Machine Translation and Human Translation”. Journal of Physics. 2018, pp. 1-6. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062046. Accessed 21 April 2021