Una segunda oportunidad para ganar

  1. José Antonio Martínez
  2. Juan García 1
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726 1988-2041

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: La Educación Física y la Promoción de Estilos de Vida Activos: Interrogaciones, Investigación y Dilemas

Issue: 31

Pages: 151-156

Type: Article

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Metrics

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2017
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.26
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 177/302
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 640/1528
  • Area: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 110/212

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2017
  • Journal Impact: 1.530
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 6/239
  • Field: DEPORTE Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 2/43

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2017
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.8
  • Area: Education Percentile: 34
  • Area: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Percentile: 33
  • Area: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Percentile: 25

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2017
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.35
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 85/122

Abstract

This research analyzes the boost in motivation that teams experience when getting a second chance to achieve the desired objective within competition settings. To achieve this aim we analyzed the NBA framework, where two teams compete for victory in each game. Through the analysis of 390 matches that ended in a draw, and therefore the final result was reached in the overtime, we show how teams tying a game on the final play of the match are more likely to win in the overtime when playing away, but not at home. Being the first team to score in the overtime increases the probability of winning the game for both home and away situations.

Funding information

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
  • Ariely, D. (2010.The upside of irrationality: The unexpected benefits of defying logic at work and at home. Editorial Harpercollins.
  • Arkes, J. & Martínez, J. (2011). Finally, Evidence for a Momentum Effect in the NBA. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(3), Artículo 13.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. Enciclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, 71-81.
  • Bawa, K. & Shoemaker, R. W. (2004).The effects of free sample promotions on incremental brand sales. Marketing Science, 23(3), 345-363.
  • Berger, J. & Pope D. (2011). Can Losing Lead to Winning? Management Science, 57(5), 817-827.
  • Berri, D. J. & Schmidt,M. B. (2010). Stumbling on wins: Two economists explore the pitfalls on the road to victory in professional sports. Financial TimesPress (Princeton, N.J.)
  • Casals, M. & Martínez, J. A. (2013). Modelling player performance in basketball through mixed models. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sports, 13(1), 64-82
  • Casullo, M. M. (2006). Las razones para perdonar: Concepciones populares o teorías implícitas. Psicodebate, 7, 9-20.
  • Dobson, S. & Goddard, J. (2011). The economics of football. Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press.
  • Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behavior. Achievement and Achievement Motivation, 75-146.
  • García-Marín, P., Argudo, F. M. & Alonso, J. I. (2015). La acción de juego en desigualdad numérica por periodos en waterpolo. Retos, 27, 14-18.
  • Gilovich, T. D. & Medvec,V. (1995). The experience of regret: What, where, when and why?. Psychological Review, 102(2), 379-395.
  • Goldstein, N. J., Martin, S. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Yes! 50 scientifically proven ways to be persuasive. New York: Free Press.
  • Gutiérrez, O., Fernández, J. J., & Saavedra, M. (2014). Determination of the home advantage in handball Olympic Games and European Championships. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 9(4), 752760
  • Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Mersmann, P. (2007). When gains loom larger than losses: reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105.
  • Hossain, T. & List, J. A. (2009). The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. NBER Working Paper 15623.
  • Jensen, M. C. & Meckling,W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
  • Kalra A. & Shi, M. (2001). Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective.Marketing Science, 20 (3), 170-193.
  • Kermer, D.A., Driver-Linn, E., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17, 649-653.
  • Kivetz, R., O. Urminsky, & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal Marketing Research, 43(1), 39-58.
  • Koning, R. H. (2005). Home advantage in speed skating: Evidence from individual data. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 417-427.
  • Martínez, J.A. (2012). Entrenador nuevo, ¿victoria segura? Evidencia en baloncesto / Changing a coach, guarantee the win? Evidence in basketball. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 12(48), 663-679.
  • McCullagh, P., & Weiss, M. R. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology,205-238. Editorial H. A. Hasenblaus,& C. M. Janelle.
  • McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., Kahneman, D. & Schkade, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science, 21, 1438-1445.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1974). Expectancy theory prediction of salesman´s performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 243-253.
  • Patrick, V. M., Lancellotti M. & Hagtvedt, H. (2009). Getting a second chance: The role of imagery in the influence of inaction regret on behavioral intent. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 181-190.
  • Pollard, R. & Pollard, G. (2005). Long-term trends in home advantage in professional team sports in North America and England (18762003). Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 337-350.
  • Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2009). Home advantage in football in South-West Europe: Long-term trends, regional variation, and team differences. Journal of Sports Sciences, 9(6), 341-352.
  • Reed, D. & O’Donoghue, P. (2005). Development and application of computer-based prediction methods. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sports, 5, 12-28.
  • Sari, I., Ekici, S., Soyer, F. & Eskiler, E. (2015). Does self-confidence link to motivation? A atudy in field hockey athletes. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 10(1), 24-35.
  • Shiv, B., Carmon, Z. & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (4), 383-393.
  • Silva, J. M., Hardy, C. J., & Crace, R. K. (1988). Analysis of psychological momentum in intercollegiate tennis.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 346-354.
  • Srivastava R., Pelton L. & Strutton, D. (2001). The will to win: An exploratory investigation of how sales managers can inspire sales force effort. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 11-26.
  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations.Editorial H. Tajfel.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-1061.
  • Van Dijk, E. & Van Knippenberg, D. (1998). Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion, and the comparability of consumer goods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 485-495.
  • Verano D. & Zoghbi, P. (2004). Determinantes de la intención de participar en un concurso de ventas: un modelo basado en la teoría del comportamiento planificado. Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas, 30, 102-113.
  • Wang, Y., Hilsman, W., Caudill, S. B. & Mixon, F. G., Jr. (2014). Television Coverage and Outcome Uncertainty in Sports:Empirical Evidence from the NBA and WNBA. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 35(10), 34-45.
  • Williams, J. M., & Krane, V. (2001). Psychological characteristics of peak performance. Applied sport psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance, 137-147.
  • Winston, W. L. (2009). Mathletics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the markets. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.