Board Composition and Accounting Conservatism: The Role of Business Experts, Support Specialist and Community Influentials
- Enache, Luminita 2
- García‐Meca, Emma 1
- 1 Technical University of Cartagena
-
2
University of Calgary
info
ISSN: 1035-6908, 1835-2561
Año de publicación: 2018
Volumen: 29
Número: 1
Páginas: 252-265
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Australian Accounting Review
Resumen
In this study, we examine the relationship between accounting conservatism and board composition. We categorise outside directors according to their skills, abilities, connections and knowledge in three different categories: business experts, support specialists and community influentials. We address three main questions: Is the financial and accounting expertise of directors relevant to improving accounting conservatism? Does specialised expertise in the board affect the speed at which news is reflected in earnings? And how do the political ties of directors affect the sensitivity of earnings to bad news? Our sample consists of active US biotech firms publicly traded on the NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ stock exchanges during the 2005–2013 period. Our study confirms that not all outside directors are equally effective in monitoring and contracting and that certain kinds of outside directors, such as politicians, can even lower the sensitivity of earnings to bad news. Our robustness analysis confirms that these results are not conditional on the accounting measure, and suggest that distinguishing directors according to their skills and abilities is crucial to understanding the way in which firm boards affect conservatism.
Referencias bibliográficas
- 10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
- 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.867
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.01.005
- 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00161.x
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.006
- 10.1353/pfs.2001.0002
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
- 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
- Baysinger B.D., (1986), Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, pp. 339
- 10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
- 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00342.x
- 10.1111/corg.12064
- 10.1108/09513570510627685
- 10.2308/acch.2006.20.4.351
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.08.004
- 10.1016/j.jcae.2009.06.001
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.003
- 10.2308/accr-50585
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01548.x
- 10.1093/rfs/hht071
- 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x
- Denis D. Denis D.andWalker M.2014 ‘Matching Directors with Firms: The Roles of Industry Expertise and CEO Influence’ https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2447060.
- 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.004
- Faccio M., (2009), Discussion Paper Series, 44, pp. 1
- Faleye O. Hoitash R.andHoitash U.2014 ‘Industry Expertise on Corporate Boards’ Research Paper Northeastern University D'Amore‐McKim School of Business.
- 10.1086/431448
- 10.1080/09638180701706922
- 10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1
- 10.1007/s11846-015-0167-7
- 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00024-0
- 10.1093/rfs/hhn088
- 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.002
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
- 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00140.x
- Hermalin B., (2003), Economic Policy Review, 9, pp. 7
- 10.1177/0149206304272187
- Hillman A., (2000), Journal of Management, 37, pp. 235
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
- Jones C.D., (2008), Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 359
- 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649
- 10.1506/car.25.3.7
- 10.1002/smj.649
- 10.1111/corg.12015
- 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00390.x
- Litov L.P., (2014), Georgetown Law Journal, 102, pp. 413
- 10.1177/0148558X0301800111
- Mace M., (1971), Directors: Myth and Reality
- 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00643.x
- 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
- 10.13106/jidb.2014.vol5.no2.13.
- 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
- Pfeffer J., (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
- Ramón C., (2018), Long Range Planning
- 10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17002-1
- 10.1016/j.cjar.2015.05.001
- Sullivan J., (1990), Organization, Management, and Expert Systems
- 10.1017/S0022109015000459
- Watts R.L., (1978), The Accounting Review, 53, pp. 112
- 10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8
- 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.138
- 10.1177/014920638901500208