Crítica del análisis de la validez de constructo de la Escala de Detección de alumnos con Altas Capacidades para Padres (GRS 2)réplica a Tourón et al. (2023)

Referencias bibliográficas

• Allen, B., & Pistone, L. F. (2023). Psychometric evaluation of a singleitem screening tool for the presence of problematic sexual behavior among preteen children. Child abuse & neglect, 143, 106327. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106327
• Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
• Barret P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
• Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple Structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41–75. https://doi. org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.107.2.238
• Bergkvist, L. & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multipleitem versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1509/ jmkr.44.2.175
• Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305– 314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
• Bollen K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual review of psychology, 53, 605–634. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
• Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000056
• Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the test measures it. The New Republic, 35, 35-37.
• Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. (2013). Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121.
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071.
• Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C. T., Andersen, B. L., Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.403
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological test. Pyschological Bulletin, 52, 218-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0040957
• Durvasula, S., Sharma, S., Carter, K. (2012). Correcting the t statistic for measurement error. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 671–682. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11002-012-9170-9
• Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: Towards an integrative and analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144–192.
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 334-367. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
• Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2017). Análisis de redes: ¿una nueva forma de comprender la psicopatología? Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 10(4), 206-215.
• Fornell, C. & Yi, Y. (1992). Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 291-320.
• Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Hayduk, L. A. (2014a). Seeing perfectly-fitting factor models that are causally misspecified: Understanding that close-fitting models can be worse. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(6), 905-926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414527449
• Hayduk, L. A. (2014b). Shame for disrespecting evidence: The personal consequences of insufficient respect for structural equation model testing. BMC: Medical Research Methodology, 14, 124. https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-124
• Hayduk, L. A., Cummings, G. Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841-850.
• Hayduk, L. A., Estabrooks, C. A., Hoben, M. (2019). Fusion Validity: Theory-Based Scale Assessment via Causal Structural Equation Modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.01139
• Hayduk, L. A., & Glaser, D. N. (2000a). Jiving the four-step, waltzing around factor analysis, and other serious fun. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 1-35.
• Hayduk, L. A., & Glaser, D. N. (2000b). Doing the four-step, right-2-3, wrong-2-3: A brief reply to Mulaik and Millsap; Bollen; Bentler; and Herting and Costner. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 111-123.
• Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 159, 1-17. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-159
• Hayduk, L.A., Ratner, P.A., Johnson, J.L., Bottorff, J.L. (1995). Attitudes, ideology and the factor model. Political Psychology, 16, 479–507
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jabůrek, M., Ťápal, A., Portešová, Š., Pfeiffer, S. I. (2020). Validity and Reliability of Gifted Rating Scales-School Form in Sample of Teachers and Parents – A Czech Contribution. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920970718
• Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312 896219871976
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 443-477.
• Jung J. Y. (2022). Physical giftedness/talent: A systematic review of the literature on identification and development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 961624. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961624
• Kelly, M. S. & Peverly, S. T. (1992). Identifying bright kindergartners at risk for learning difficulties: Predictive validity of a kindergarten screening tool. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 245-258.
• Liddell, T. M. & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 328-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
• Lissitz, R. W. (Editor) (2009). The Concept of Validity: Revisions, New Directions, and Applications. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
• Manzano, A. Arranz, F., Enrique B. (2008). Contexto familiar, superdotación, talento y altas capacidades». Anuario de psicología / The UB Journal of psychology, 39(3), 289-309, https://raco.cat/index. php/AnuarioPsicologia/article/view/123643
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment of hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341. doi:10.1207/ s15328007sem11032
• Martínez, J. A., Ko, Y. J., & Martínez, L. (2010). An application of fuzzy logic to service quality research: A case of fitness service. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 502-523. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm. 24.5.502
• Martínez, J. A. & Martínez, L. (2009). El análisis factorial confirmatorio y la validez de escalas en modelos causales. Anales de Psicología, 25(2), 368-374.
• Martínez, J. A. & Martínez, L. (2010a). Re-thinking perceived service quality. An alternative to hierarchical and multidimensional models. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(1), 93-118
• Martínez, J. A. & Martínez, L. (2010b). La medición de la satisfacción de servicios deportivos a través de la lógica borrosa. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 19(1), 41-58.
• Martínez, L., & Martínez, J. A. (2008). Developing a multidimensional and hierarchical service quality model for the travel agencies industry. Tourism Management, 29, 706–720.
• Matthews, R. A., Pineault, L. & Hong, Y. H. (2022). Normalizing the use of single-item measures: Validation of the single item compendium for organizational psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37, 639-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3
• McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2006.09.020
• McIntosh, C. N. (2012). Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, CM, Fayers, PM, Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, NW, Sprangers, MAJ, Velikov, G., Aaronson, NK (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research. Quality of Life Research, 21(9), 1619- 1621.
• McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425
• Nakano, T. D., Primi, R., Ribeiro, W. D., Almeida, L. D. (2016). Multidimensional Assessment of Giftedness: criterion Validity of Battery of Intelligence and Creativity Measures in Predicting Arts and Academic Talents. Anales De Psicologia, 32, 628-637.
• Niemand, T. & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible Cutoff Values for Fit Indices in the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1148-1172.
• Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press.
• Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., & Kumtepe, A. (2008). The Gifted Rating Scales- School Form: A Validation Study Based on Age, Gender, and Race. Roeper review, 30(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190801955418
• Rönkkö, M., McIntosh, C. N., Antonakis, J., Edwards, J. R. (2016). Partial least squares path modeling: Time for some serious second thoughts. Journal of Operations Management, 47–48, 9–27. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.002
• Ropovik, I. (2015). A cautionary note on testing latent variable models. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01715
• Sofologi, M., Papantoniou, G., Avgita, T., Lyraki, A., Thomaidou, C., Zaragas, H., Ntritsos, G., Varsamis, P., Staikopoulos, K., Kougioumtzis, G., Papantoniou, A., & Moraitou, D. (2022). The Gifted Rating Scales- Preschool/Kindergarten Form (GRS-P): A Preliminary Examination of Their Psychometric Properties in Two Greek Samples. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 12(11), 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagno stics12112809
• Spanos. A. (2019). Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: Empirical Modeling with Observational Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Spanos, A. (2021). Modeling vs. inference in frequentist statistics: ensuring the tustworthiness of empirical evidence. Descargado desde: https://errorstatistics.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/modeling-vsinference- 3-2021.pdf
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-898.
• Tourón, M., Navarro-Asensio, E., Tourón, J. (2023). Validez de Constructo de la Escala de Detección de alumnos con Altas Capacidades para Padres, (GRS 2), en España. Revista de Educación, 1(402), 55-83. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-402-595
• Wulf, J. N., Sajons, G. B., Pogrebna, G. et al. (2023). Common methodological mistakes. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101677