¿Las actitudes hacia el servicio deportivo varían según el grado de experiencia del consumidor?

  1. Martínez, José Antonio
  2. Martínez Caro, Laura
Revista:
European Journal of Human Movement

ISSN: 0214-0071,  2386-4095

Año de publicación: 2009

Número: 22

Páginas: 133-146

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Human Movement

Resumen

This research has analysed if consumer evaluations of a sports service, manifested by satisfaction and perceived quality, differ to the extent that consumer experience varies. For that purpose, we have achieved three cross-sectional studies on different samples of users of a sports centre. The results show that newer and more experienced customers adjust their expectations in the same way. In addition, perceived quality and satisfaction differs because customers admit that they can be very satisfied with a service, although the service does not reach the highest level of excellence. Moreover, both attitudes are very positive. Satisfaction and quality do not depend on experience, because newer customers do not create illusory expectations about the service. Finally, implications and limitations are discussed.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ÁBALO, J., VARELA, J., Y RIAL, A. (2006). El análisis de importancia-valoración aplicado a la gestión de servicios. Psicothema, 18, 730-737.
  • AGUINIS, H., PIERCE, C. A., Y CULPEPPER, S. A. (En prensa). Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact: Correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organizational Research Methods.
  • ANDERSON, E. W., Y SULLIVAN, M.W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction. Marketing Science, 12, 125-143.
  • ANDREASSEN, W. T. (1995). (Dis)satisfaction with public services: the case of public transportation. Journal of Services Marketing, 9 (5), 30-41
  • ATO, M. Y LÓPEZ, J. J. (1996): Análisis estadístico para datos categóricos. Ed. Síntesis, Madrid.
  • BERGKVIST, L., Y ROSSITER, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item vs. single item measures of the same construct, Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 175-184.
  • BITNER, M. J., Y HUBBERT, A. R. (1994). Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus quality, En Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Eds. Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver. London: Sage Publications, Inc, pp. 72-94.
  • BRADY, M. K., Y CRONIN JR. J. J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach, Journal of Marketing, 65 (Julio), 34-49.
  • DAWES, R. M., SINGER, D., Y LEMONS, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (Marzo), 281-295.
  • EKINCI, Y. (2003). Which comparison standard should be used for service quality and customer satisfaction?. Current Issues and Development in Hospitality and Tourism Satisfaction, 4, 61-75.
  • FORNELL, C. (1992). National satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56 (Enero), 6-21.
  • FOURNIER, S., Y MICK, D. G. (1999). Rediscovering Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 5-23.
  • HAYDUK, L. A. (1996). Lisrel Issues, Debates and Strategies. Baltimore, M. D.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • HITCHCOCK, C. (2002). Probabilistic causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • HOVLAND, C.I., HARVEY, O. J., Y SHERIF, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in relations to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55 (Julio), 244-252.
  • JOHNSON, M. D., HERRMANN, A., Y HUBER, F. (2006). The evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(Abril), 122-132.
  • JONHSON, M. D., Y FORNELL, C. (1991). A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and products categories. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 267-86.
  • JÖRESKOG, K., Y SÖRBOM, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • JÖRESKOG, K., Y SÖRBOM, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Scientific Software International, Inc
  • KAHNEMAN, D., Y TVERSKY, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263- 291.
  • MARTÍNEZ, J. A., Y MARTÍNEZ, L. (2006). La influencia de la experiencia del consumidor en el paradigma de la disconfirmación de expectativas. Un estudio sobre la satisfacción en un servicio deportivo. XVI Congreso Nacional de ACEDE. Valencia, Septiembre.
  • MARTÍNEZ, J. A., Y MARTÍNEZ, L. (2008). Qué es la percepción de la calidad del servicio. Nuevas aportaciones tras el uso de la introspección personal y subjetiva. Manuscrito enviado para publicación.
  • MARZO, J. C., MARTÍNEZ-TUR, V., RAMOS, J., Y PEIRÓ, J. M. (2002). La satisfacción del usuario desde el modelo de la confirmación de expectativas: respuesta a algunos interrogantes. Psicothema, 14, 765-770.
  • MILLER, J.A. (1977). Studying satisfaction: modifying models, eliciting expectations, posing problems and making meaningful measurements, En Hunt, H.K. (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction (pp. 72-91). Ed. School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • MITTAL, V., Y KAMAKURA, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 131-142.
  • OLIVER, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing, 17 (Noviembre), 460-469.
  • OLIVER, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the customer. Ed. McGrawHill Companies, New York.
  • OLIVER, R. L., Y DE SARBO, W. (1988). Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (Marzo), 495-507.
  • PARASURAMAN, A., ZEITHAML, V. A., Y BERRY, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service qua¬lity and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41 50.
  • PARASURAMAN, A., ZEITHAML, V. A., Y BERRY, L. L (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12-40
  • PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S. B., LEE, J. L., Y PODSAKOFF, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
  • RUST, R. T., INMAN, J. J., JIA, J., Y ZAHORIK, A. (1999). What you don’t know about customer-perceived quality: The role of customer expectation distributions. Marketing Science, 18 (1), 77-92.
  • SACHDEV, S. B., Y VERMA, H.V. (2004). Relative importance of service quality dimensions: A multisectorial study. Journal of Services Research, 4 (1), 93-116.
  • SEIDERS, K., VOSS, G. B., GREWAL, D. Y GODFREY, A. L. (2005). Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 26-43.
  • TEAS, K. R. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumer’s perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing, 57 (Octubre), 18 34
  • TSE, D. K., Y WILTON P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: an extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (Mayo), 204-212.
  • TUKEY, J. W. (1977), Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass
  • VAN LEEUWEN, L. QUICK, S., Y DANIEL, K. (2002). The sport spectator satisfaction model: A conceptual framework for understanding the satisfaction of spectators. Sport Management Review, 5 (2), 99-128.
  • VERMUNT, J. (1998). lEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg University
  • WOODRUFF, R. B., CARDOTTE, E. P., Y JENKINS, R.L. (1982). Modelling consumer satisfaction process using experience based norms. Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (Agosto), 296-304.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet