Transparencia y legitimidad de la seguridad pública. Un enfoque de valor social, gestión responsable y eficacia social

  1. del Olmo Fernández, Ignacio 1
  2. Briones Peñalver, Antonio Juan 2
  3. Fernández Cañavate, Francisco José 2
  1. 1 Cuerpo Nacional de Policía, Región de Murcia (España)
  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (España)
Revista:
REVESCO: revista de estudios cooperativos

ISSN: 1135-6618

Año de publicación: 2024

Número: 147

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/REVE.97068 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: REVESCO: revista de estudios cooperativos

Resumen

The paper studies transparency and legitimacy from the scope of their contribution to Spanish Security and Police Forces. On those grounds a theoretical exposition about the meaning and relevance of the principle of transparency and good governance and its application through legitimacy, which also settles and justifies the so-called procedural justice, the cornerstone of the relationship between citizens and their police forces. To verify such this hypothesis, an empirical search is conducted, based on a survey completed via an internet link for the anonymous and voluntary answering, getting 421 answers to the questionnaire. The results were analyzed by a statistical multivariant analysis to gauge the importance rendered by citizens to those concepts and their perception accordingly of the police forces. Their actions are evaluated based on the concept of the use of police force as a public good, institutionally administered and based on public and responsibility. Citizenship satisfaction with public security is positively valued based on transparency and efficiency in policing, raising higher levels of public support when is based on legitimate behavior. Several proposals are made on the appliance of those principles, suggestion some further lines of investigation upon proceedings to increase better and sustainable outcomes in future police actions as the pilar to sustain public security.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, R. E., Rohe, W. M., y Arcury, T. A. (2005). Awareness of community-oriented policing and neighborhood perceptions in five small to midsize cities. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 43-54. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.10.008.
  • Alcantara, L., Mitsuhashi, H., y Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12(4), 389-407.
  • Bañón, R., y Carrillo, E. (1997). La nueva administración pública: Alianza Madrid.
  • Bañón, R. y Carrillo., E. (1998). La nueva administración pública (Book Review) (Vol. 53): Alianza. Madrid.
  • Bazaga, I. (2014). Dirección estratégica y Generación de Valor público: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
  • Bazaga, I., . en Bañón, R y Carrillo, E. . (2021). El planteamiento estratégico en el ámbito público. In A. E. Textos. (Ed.), Bañón, R y Carrillo, E. “La Nueva Administración Pública”. (comps.): Alianza. Madrid.
  • Beetham, D. (1991). Towards a social-scientific concept of legitimacy. The legitimation of power, 3-41.
  • Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T., y Zuleta, S. (1968). La construcción social de la realidad (Vol. 975): Amorrortu Buenos Aires.
  • Bonner, M. D. (2021). Reclaiming citizenship from police violence. Citizenship Studies, 25(3), 317-332. doi:10.1080/13621025.2021.1903396.
  • Bonner, M. D., y Dammert, L. (2022). Constructing police legitimacy during protests: frames and consequences for human rights. Policing and Society, 32(5), 629-645. doi:10.1080/10439463.2021.1957887.
  • Bottoms, A., y Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law y Criminology, 102(1), 119-170.
  • Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman: University of Iowa Press.
  • Bradford, B. (2017a). Police stops and the problem of legitimacy.
  • Bradford, B. (2017b). Stop and Search and Police Legitimacy.
  • Bradford, B., Milani, J., y Jackson, J. (2017). Identity, legitimacy and "making sense" of police use of force. Policingan International Journal of Police Strategies y Management, 40(3), 614-627. doi:10.1108/pijpsm-06-2016-0085.
  • Briones, A. J., Santos, J. A., Bernal, J. A., y Custodio, M. (2018). Influence of cooperation and collaborative ICT in knowledge management. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 77(6), 313-317.
  • Castellanos Claramunt, J. (2022). Transparencia y participación ciudadana: la lucha contra la corrupción como eje vertebrador del proceso democrático. Revista Española de la Transparencia, num. 15, 107-129.
  • Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo, 2006. Transparencia y derecho de acceso a los documentos en la Constitución Europea y en la realidad de su ejercicio. La Constitución Europea: actas del III Congreso Nacional de Constitucionalistas de España / coord. por Marc Carrillo, Héctor López Bofill, 2006, ISBN 84-8456-641-2, 285-308.
  • Cruz-Suárez, A., Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., y Prado-Román, C. (2014). Análisis de las relaciones entre la legitimidad organizativa, sus fuentes y dimensiones. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 19(65), 9-22.
  • Cruz-Suárez, A., Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., y Prado-Román, C. (2013). Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(2), 120-125.
  • Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., y Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of research in crime delinquency, 33(4), 389-426.
  • Fagan, J., y Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Behavioral Sciences y the Law, 18, 217-241.
  • Frank, J., Smith, B. W., y Novak, K. J. (2005). Exploring the basis of citizens’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly, 8(2), 206-228.
  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge University Press.
  • García-Escudero Márquez, P. G. (2015). "Regeneración del Parlamento, transparencia y participación ciudadana". En Teoría y Realidad Constitucional (36), 171-216. UNED.
  • González-García, L., y García, J. G. (2022). Significado del concepto Gobierno Abierto en las administraciones españolas. Revista de la Transparencia (15), 157-180.
  • Guerrero Agripino, L. F., y De Santiago Álvarez, A. (2013). El uso legítimo de la fuerza policial: breve acercamiento al contexto mexicano. Ciencia Juridica, 2(3), 31-59.
  • Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L., y Black, W.C. (2001). Análisis multivariante. Prentice Hall. Madrid, 6ª Edición.
  • Hoffman, D. E., Webb, V. J., y Snell, J. C. (1977). Freedom and order in administration of justice Simulation game. Teaching Sociology, 4(2), 177-184. doi:10.2307/1317027
  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., y Bradford, B. (2013). Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey. In Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Ed.), in Tankebe, J. and Liebling, A. (eds.) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyde, A. (1983). The concept of legitimation in the Sociology of Law. Wisconsin Law Review(2), 379-426.
  • Jackson, J., y Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. The British journal of sociology, 60(3), 493-521.
  • Jackson, J., Huq, A. Z., Bradford, B., y Tyler, T. R. (2013). Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 19(4), 479-497. doi:10.1037/a0033852.
  • Jonathan-Zamir, T., y Harpaz, A. (2014). Police understanding of the foundations of their legitimacy in the eyes of the public The Case of Commanding Officers in the Israel National Police. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 469-489. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu001.
  • Kasarda, J. D., y Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 328- 339.
  • Kochel, T. R. (2012). Can Police Legitimacy Promote Collective Efficacy?. Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 384-419. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.561805.
  • Kochel, T. R. (2018). Applying police legitimacy, cooperation, and collective security hypotheses to explain collective efficacy and violence across neighbourhoods. International Journal of Comparative Applied Criminal Justice42(4), 253-272.
  • Liederbach, J., Fritsch, E. J., Carter, D. L., Bannister, A. (2008). Exploring the limits of collaboration in community policing: A direct comparison of police and citizen views. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies, 31(2), 271-291.
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique of measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psichology (140). 1-50.
  • Lind, E. A., y Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice: Springer Science y Business Media.
  • Maccoby, E. E., Johnson, J. P., y Church, R. M. (1958). Community Integration and the Social Control of Juvenile Delinquency 1. Journal of Social Issues, 14(3), 38-51.
  • Marín, F. D., González, A. B., Suárez, A. C., y Román, C. P. (2014). Efecto de la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial sobre la Legitimidad de las Empresas. Anuario jurídico y económico escurialense(47), 325-348.
  • Mawby, R. C., y Worthington, S. (2002). Marketing the Police–from a Force to a Service. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(9-10), 857-876.
  • Medina, J. L. R. (2018). La evaluación de la transparencia en España a debate metodológico: mesta e índices de transparencia internacional. Revista internacional de transparencia e integridad, 6(7).
  • Mesko, G., y Tankebe, J. (2015). Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice: Springer.
  • Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., y Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. American journal of Sociology and Criminology, 39(3), 517-558.
  • Morente García, R. (2024). La seguridad ciudadana en el Código Penal. Sistema actual y perspectiva de futuro.
  • Muñoz, M. D. C. y Briones, A.J. (2011). Good governance in the entities of the social economy. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (73), 171-191.
  • Muñoz, M. D. C., Briones, A. J., y Santos, J. A. C. (2018). Innovation management and cooperation in the government of social economy entities. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 77(12), 684-687.
  • Osse, A. (2007). Entender la labor policial ;recursos para activistas de derechos humanos (A. International Ed.): Amnesty International.
  • Parks, W. (1957). Open Government Principle: Applying the right to know under the Constitution. 26, 1.
  • Pérez de Rozas, E. (2014). Definición del concepto de Seguridad: diferencias entre “security” y “safety". Paper presented at the Definición del concepto de Seguridad: diferencias entre “security” y “safety" XIX edición de los Cursos de Verano de el Escorial. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. 2014.
  • Radburn, M., y Stott, C. (2019). The social psychological processes of ‘procedural justice’: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology Criminal Justice, 19(4), 421-438.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., y Sampson, R. J. J. S. M. (1999). Ecometrics: toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. 29(1), 1-41.
  • Reiner, R. (2012). Policing and the media. In Handbook of policing (pp. 341-364): Willan.
  • Ros Medina, J.L. (2018). La evaluación de la transparencia en España a debate metodológico: Mesta e Índices de Transparencia Internacional. Revista internacional de transparencia e integridad, Nº 6.
  • Ruiz Rodríguez, L. R. (2016). Estudio multidisciplinar de la operativa y del uso de la fuerza policial: .
  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., y Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science (Washington, DC, U.S.), 277(5328), 918-924.
  • Sampson, R. J., y Raudenbush, S. W. J. A. J. O. S. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. 105(3), 603-651.
  • Silver, E., y Miller, L. L. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighborhoods. Criminology, 42(3), 551-584.
  • St. Louis, S., y Greene, J. R. (2020). Social context in police legitimacy: giving meaning to police/community contacts. Policing and Society, 30(6), 656-673. doi:10.1080/10439463.2019.1578768.
  • Schumpeter, J. (1968). Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia. Madrid: Aguilar.
  • Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in ghana: does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47(4), 1265-1293. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00175.x.
  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., Brower, S. J. J. O. R. I. C., y Delinquency. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. 21(4), 303-331.
  • Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., y Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 789-796. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.789.
  • Tornikoski, E. T., y Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311-335.
  • Triplett, R. A., Gainey, R. R., y Sun, I. Y. (2003). Institutional strength, social control and neighborhood crime rates. Theoretical Criminology, 7(4), 439-467. doi:10.1177/13624806030074003.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law, New Haven, NY. In: Yale Univ. Press.
  • Tyler, T. R., y Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Tyler, T. R., y Wakslak, C. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. 42(2), 253-282.
  • Tyler, T. R., y Justice. J. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. 30, 283-357.
  • Uriel, E., y Aldás, J. (2005): Análisis multivariante aplicado. Thomson, Madrid.
  • Vogel, B.. (2011). Perceptions of the police: The influence of individual and contextual factors in a racially diverse urban sample. 9(4), 267-290.
  • Weber, M. (1946 [1922]). Class, status, party,pp. 180–95 de Max Weber Essays in Sociology, ed. H. H. Gerth y . Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press. New York.
  • Wells, W., Schafer, J. A., Varano, S. P., Bynum, T. S. J. C., y Delinquency. (2006). Neighborhood residents' production of order: The effects of collective efficacy on responses to neighborhood problems. 52(4), 523-550.
  • Villoria, M., y Jiménez, F. (2014). Estado de derecho, cultura de la legalidad y buena gobernanza. Cultura de la legalidad en Iberoamérica: Desafíos y experiencias. Costa Rica: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).
  • Wiedlitzka, S., MAZEROLLE, L., Fay-Ramirez, S., y Miles-Johnson, T. (2018). Perceptions of Police Legitimacy and Citizen Decisions to Report Hate Crime Incidents in Australia. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 7(2), 91-106. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i2.489.
  • Wood, G., Tyler, T. R., y Papachristos, A. V. (2020). Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(18), 9815-9821. doi:10.1073/pnas.1920671117.
  • Zimmerman, M. A., y Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet