Family owners and the appointment of family and non-family women directorsWhere is the ownership point where preferences change?

  1. Emma García-Meca 1
  2. Domingo Javier Santana Martín 2
  1. 1 Universidad Técnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 52

Número: 1

Páginas: 167-186

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2022.2031508 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Proyectos relacionados

Género y Liderazgo: Hacia una estrategia de gestión y Transparencia sostenible

2022/00552/001

Resumen

We analyse the impact of voting rights in the hands of the dominant family owner on the presence of women directors in a sample of listed family firms in Spain during 2007–2020. As distinctive features of this paper, we examine whether women directors have or do not have family ties with the dominant family owner, use the control-chain methodology to identify the ultimate or dominant owner of Spanish listed firms and analyse a curvilinear association between family ownership and the appointment of family and non-family female directors in family firms. Drawing on socioemotional, agency and stewardship theories, our results show that when the voting rights of the dominant families are low, they appoint more female directors with family associations. The results also indicate that when family voting rights are high, family founders appoint more non-family women directors to benefit from their industry-specific expertise and objective advice. Overall, our findings suggest that when a certain level of family ownership is reached there is a need to reduce the appointment of women directors with family ties in order to move towards a more balanced and diversified board with a wider representation of skills, knowledge, diverse experiences and talent.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance : Evidence from the S & P 500. American Finance Association, 58, 1301–1328. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
  • Arellanom M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some test specification for panel data. Monte Carlo evidence and an aplication to employemnt equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
  • Basco, R., Campopiano, G., Calabrò, A., & Kraus, S. (2019). They are not all the same! investigating the effect of executive versus non-executive family board members on firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 57 (2), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12535
  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
  • Bettinelli, C. (2011). Boards of directors in family firms: An exploratory study of structure and group process. Family Business Review, 24 (2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0894486511402196
  • Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23 (2), 129–144. 7. https:// doi.org/10.1111/corg.12097
  • Bona Sánchez, C., Pérez Alemán, J., & Santana Martín, D. J. (2011). Defence measures and earnings management in an owner dominant context. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38 (7–8), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02246.x
  • Bona Sánchez, C., Pérez Alemán, J., & Santana Martín, D. J. (2014). Politically connected firms and earnings informativeness in the controlling versus minority shareholders context: European evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22 (4), 330–346. https://doi.org/10. 1111/corg.12064
  • Cabrera-Suarez, M. K., & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2015). Board composition and performance in Spanish non-listed family firms: The influence of type of directors and CEO duality. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.08.001
  • Campopiano, G., Massi, A., & Chirico, F. (2014). Firm philanthropy in small-and medium-sized family firms. Family Business Review, 27 (3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0894486514538450
  • Castaldi, R., & Wortman, M. S. (1984). Board of directors in small corporations: An untapped resource. American Journal of Small Business, 9 (2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 104225878400900201
  • Chadwick, I. C., & Dawson, A. (2018). Women leaders and firm performance in family businesses: An examination of financial and nonfinancial outcomes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9 (4), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.10.002
  • Claessens, S., Djankow, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrench-ment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57 (6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1540-6261.00511
  • Cole, P. M., & Cole, P. M. (1997). Women in family business. Family Business Review, 10 (4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00353.x
  • Corten, M., Steijevers, S., & Lybaert, N. (2017). The effects of intrafamily agency conflicts on audit demand in private family firms: The moderating role of the board of directors. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8 (1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.003
  • Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate governance mechanisms: A plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10 (2), 84–93. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467–8683.00272
  • Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (1), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.005
  • Davis, J., Schoorman, F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Towards a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 158, S65–S80. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707.180258
  • Dou, J., Zhang, Z., & Su, E. (2014). Does family involvement make firms donate more? Empirical evidence from Chinese private firms. Family Business Review, 27 (3), 259–274. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0894486514538449
  • Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006, November). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
  • Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11 (2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
  • Faccio, M., & Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0
  • Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal Corporate Finance, 11 (1–2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001
  • Francis, J., Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2005). Earnings and dividend informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (2), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.001
  • García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F., & Santana Marín, D. J. (2022). Board gender diversity and dividend payout: The critical mass and the family ties effect. International Review of Financial Analysis, 79, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101973
  • García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F., & Tejerina, F. (2015). Institutional investors on boards: Does their behavior influence corporate finance? Journal of Business Ethics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10551-015-2882-z
  • Gillan S. L., & Starks L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposal and shareholder activism. The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2), 275–305.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K., Nuñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10. 2189/asqu.52.1.106
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), 81–95. https:doi.org/10.5465/3069338
  • González, M., Guzmán, A., Pablo, E., & Trujillo, M. A. (2020). Does gender really matter in the boardroom? Evidence from closely held family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 14 (1), 221–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0292-1
  • Guerra Pérez, S., Bona Sánchez, C., & Santana Martín, D. J. (2015). Politically connected firms in Spain. Business Research Quarterly, 18, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016j.brq.2017.10.002
  • Hadi, A. (1994). A modification of a method for the detection of outliers in multivariate samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 56, 393–396.
  • Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. National Buerau of Economic Research.
  • Holton, V. M. (2000). Taking a seat on the board: Women directors in Britain. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women in management: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 145–155). Kluwer Academic.
  • Jaskiewicz, P., & Klein, S. (2007). The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 60 (10), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.015
  • Johannisson, B., & Huse, M. (2000). Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12 (4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620050177958
  • Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and Independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x
  • Kubíček, A., & Machek, O. (2020). Intrafamily conflicts in family businesses: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 33 (2), 194–227. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0894486519899573
  • La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
  • Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 794–813. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803923
  • Martinez Jimenez, R. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22 (1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486508328813
  • Martínez-Jiménez, R., Hernández-Ortíz, M. J., & Cabrera Fernández, A. I. (2020). Gender diversity influence on board effectiveness and business performance. Corporate Governance, 20 (2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0206
  • Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family- controlled companies: “Familiness”, “faultlines”, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009. 00888.x
  • Miralles-Marcelo, J. L., Miralles-Quirós, M. M., & Lisboa, I. (2012). Empresa familiar y bolsa: Análisis de rentabilidad y estrategias de inversión. REFC - Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 41 (155), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2012.1077.9730
  • Nelson, T., & Constantinidis, C. (2017). Sex and gender in family business succession research: A review and forward agenda from a social construction perspective. Family Business Review, 30 (3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517715390
  • Nguyen, T. H. H., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. K. (2020). Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101554.
  • Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women ́s roles on US Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72 (2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10551-006-9164-8
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de La Torre, C. (2012). Do family firms use dividend policy as a governance mechanism? Evidence from the Euro zone. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20 (5), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00921.x
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de La Torre, C. (2014). Family control, expropriation, and investor protection: A panel data analysis of Western European corporations. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.10.006
  • Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2011). Dominant institutional owners and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07. 020
  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2007). Family ownership and pyramids in the Spanish market. Family Business Review, 20 (3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007. 00100.x
  • Santana-Martín, D. J., & Aguiar-Díaz, I. (2006). El último propietario de las empresas cotizadas españolas. Cuadernos de Economía de Dirección de La Empresa, 26, 47–72.
  • Sarkar, J., & Selarka, E. (2015). Women on board and performance of family firms : Evidence from women on board and performance of family firms : Evidence from India. Working Paper, (October), SSRN.
  • Singal, M., & Gerde, V. W. (2015). Is diversity management related to financial performance in family firms? Family Business Review, 28 (3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0894486514566012
  • Spencer Stuart. (2020). S&P 500 board trends 2019.Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25 (1), 58–86. https://doi. org/10.1177/0894486511421665
  • Studenmund, A. H. (1997). Using Econometrics: A practical approach. Addison-Wesley.
  • Uhlaner, L., Wright, M., & Huse, M. (2007). Private firms and corporate governance: An integrated economic and management perspective. Small Business Economics, 29 (3), 225–241. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11187-006-9032-z
  • Vandebeek, A., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Huybrechts, J. (2016). Board role performance and faultlines in family firms: The moderating role of formal board evaluation. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7 (4), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.10.002
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
  • Virtanen, A. (2012). Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland. Journal of Management and Governance, 16 (4), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9164-z
  • Voordeckers, W., Van Gils, A., & Van Den Heuvel, J. (2006). Board composition in small and medium sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45 (1), 137–156. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00204.x
  • Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 (3), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00320
  • Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfineco.2012.03.005
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the context and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zana (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). Academic Press.
  • Terjensen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83 (1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 007-9656-1
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet